Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-security-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47642 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2006 01:48:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2006 01:48:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 32260 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2006 01:48:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-security-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 32246 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2006 01:48:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact security-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: security-dev@xml.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list security-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 32231 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2006 01:48:06 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:48:06 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [63.240.77.81] (HELO sccrmhc11.comcast.net) (63.240.77.81) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:48:05 -0800 Received: from ximpleware (c-24-6-90-145.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.90.145]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <200603230147240110031mrie>; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 01:47:24 +0000 Message-ID: <007901c64e1b$bd5a40d0$0d02a8c0@ximpleware> From: "Jimmy Zhang" To: References: <5263EA1C4555AD4E8A67F600C020198B1585B1@nxgs-ad1.nxgcs.net> <4421ED0B.2010009@strongauth.com> Subject: Re: Improve performance of XML Signing Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:47:20 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I also recommed that you look at vtd-XmL http://vtd-xml.sf.net... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arshad Noor" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:34 PM Subject: Re: Improve performance of XML Signing > Have you characterized the performance of the end-to-end transaction > to determine where your bottle-necks are? Without that you're shooting > in the dark - i.e. you could spend a lot of time optimizing components > of the process and still not a dent in the overall signing time. > > Arshad Noor > StrongAuth, Inc. > > Murugan Selvaraj wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> We are trying to improve the performance of the XML signing done using >> apache tool kit.Can any one help and guide me on improving the >> performance of the signing >> >> >> >> Help would be appreciated!!! >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Murugan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >