santuario-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39029] New: - Stax verifier JSR105 implementation
Date Sun, 19 Mar 2006 12:14:55 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39029>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39029

           Summary: Stax verifier JSR105 implementation
           Product: Security
           Version: Java 1.3
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: Signature
        AssignedTo: security-dev@xml.apache.org
        ReportedBy: raul-info@r-bg.com


Hi, 
I have just finished a first implementation of Stax verifier, it only works with
enveloping signatures(well any signature that appears before the signed data),
and exclusive c14n, and no transformations.

The TODO:
[ ] Do inclusive C14n
[ ] Design the API for signed data before signature describing it.
[ ] Do Transformations

For see how to use it untar the tar in a SVN head, and see the examples in
src_unitTest/com/r_bg/stax/*

Can people wanting to use stax verification(WS guys) see if the API fits its needs.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Mime
View raw message