santuario-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vishal Mahajan <vmaha...@amberpoint.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] xml-sec java 1.3 release?
Date Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:53:23 GMT
I think your suggestion makes complete sense. We should give at least a 
week of testing (after significant check-ins) before an RC goes out and 
probably little more time before for the final release. Thanks for 
bringing this up and hopefully we can incorporate this going forward.

Regards,

Vishal

Sean Mullan wrote:

> Although I have reviewed these fixes and they look fine and fairly 
> low-risk, I think it probably makes sense to allow a few days (a 
> week?) to let others test and make sure there are no regressions. 
> Comments? I'm fairly new to the process, but I just think it makes 
> sense to test the final bits as much as possible before they are 
> released. What are the guidelines? I don't necessarily think we need 
> to cut an RC2, but we should at least build an xmlsec.jar and make it 
> available for testing.
>
> --Sean
>
> Vishal Mahajan wrote:
>
>> Vishal Mahajan wrote:
>>
>>> Raul,
>>>
>>> I have filed three bugs (with suggested patches) - 36638, 36639, and 
>>> 36640, which I found recently.
>>> I'll check-in the fix for each of these tomorrow
>>
>>
>>
>> Done with the fixes.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Vishal
>>
>>> and after that it's +1 from me.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Vishal
>>>
>>> Raul Benito wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with my
>>>> day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before
>>>> doing the release (thing that  I manage to do tonight).
>>>>
>>>> But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think is
>>>> time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
>>>>
>>>> What do you thing?
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
>>>> [ ] +0, [ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Raul
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>



Mime
View raw message