santuario-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] xml-sec java 1.3 release?
Date Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:03:18 GMT
+1 from me.

On 9/14/05, Raul Benito <raul.benito.garcia@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was also going to suggest a RC2 jar, for testing.
> 
> I'll think that doing a RC jar right now is the best way to test the
> changes (There are a lot of people interested in testing that are
> afraid of generate themselves a jar).
> 
> So hat do you all think if I go ahead and do a RC2.jar and after two
> weeks call for another release vote?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Raul
> 
> 
> On 9/14/05, Vishal Mahajan <vmahajan@amberpoint.com> wrote:
> > I think your suggestion makes complete sense. We should give at least a
> > week of testing (after significant check-ins) before an RC goes out and
> > probably little more time before for the final release. Thanks for
> > bringing this up and hopefully we can incorporate this going forward.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Vishal
> >
> > Sean Mullan wrote:
> >
> > > Although I have reviewed these fixes and they look fine and fairly
> > > low-risk, I think it probably makes sense to allow a few days (a
> > > week?) to let others test and make sure there are no regressions.
> > > Comments? I'm fairly new to the process, but I just think it makes
> > > sense to test the final bits as much as possible before they are
> > > released. What are the guidelines? I don't necessarily think we need
> > > to cut an RC2, but we should at least build an xmlsec.jar and make it
> > > available for testing.
> > >
> > > --Sean
> > >
> > > Vishal Mahajan wrote:
> > >
> > >> Vishal Mahajan wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Raul,
> > >>>
> > >>> I have filed three bugs (with suggested patches) - 36638, 36639, and
> > >>> 36640, which I found recently.
> > >>> I'll check-in the fix for each of these tomorrow
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Done with the fixes.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> Vishal
> > >>
> > >>> and after that it's +1 from me.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>>
> > >>> Vishal
> > >>>
> > >>> Raul Benito wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with
my
> > >>>> day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before
> > >>>> doing the release (thing that  I manage to do tonight).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think
is
> > >>>> time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> What do you thing?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
> > >>>> [ ] +0, [ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Raul
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> http://r-bg.com
> 


-- 
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform

Mime
View raw message