Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-security-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41160 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2005 08:36:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2005 08:36:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 63102 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2005 08:36:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-security-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 63082 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2005 08:36:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact security-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: security-dev@xml.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list security-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 63068 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2005 08:36:16 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 01:36:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of raul.benito.garcia@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.170.198] (HELO rproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 01:36:17 -0700 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so767499rnf for ; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 01:36:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KGYNVB2sbO14y06AY4/sFCN7XvWQtKwtY6WcYtJu9kQEyorETPF7DOzJQt1kMpVxGFa7ME2dfiNVY13CxQBHDJ2xAxn/LC3uclQDhXOBi1E4dUSmWlyCwGPSxJk/n+JUUho4tkDWNERyTr2t0nrpq6E/UgLIlwN4KvApcRpLr5k= Received: by 10.38.11.27 with SMTP id 27mr3406247rnk; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 01:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.97.34 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 01:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <949ac94105070501365ab954ad@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:36:12 +0200 From: Raul Benito Reply-To: raul@apache.org To: security-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Use of URIs rather than enums in C++ library In-Reply-To: <200507041744.j64HidsZ015260@defang9.net.ohio-state.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <42C92CDD.5080702@wingsofhermes.org> <200507041744.j64HidsZ015260@defang9.net.ohio-state.edu> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'm afraid that we are going to have the same discussin with java library(and bigger). Perhaps it is time to decide a little policy for this thing. I'd like Scott recomendation... What othe people think? On 7/4/05, Scott Cantor wrote: > > But does anyone feel they (the enum based creation calls) should be lef= t > > in-perpetuity? (They won't be removed quickly, but they will eventuall= y > > disappear.) >=20 > I'd expect them to be deprecated for one major release (1.3?) and then > potentially dropped afterward. >=20 > -- Scott >=20 >=20 --=20 http://r-bg.com