Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-security-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 74761 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2005 09:08:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2005 09:08:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 42834 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2005 09:08:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-security-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 42818 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2005 09:08:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact security-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: security-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list security-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 42805 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2005 09:08:56 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from cust4394.vic01.dataco.com.au (HELO cerberus.wingsofhermes.org) (202.164.195.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 01:08:55 -0800 Received: (qmail 516 invoked by uid 1008); 18 Feb 2005 09:08:50 -0000 Received: from 192.168.3.10 by cerberus.wingsofhermes.org (envelope-from , uid 1002) with qmail-scanner-1.23 (clamdscan: 0.75.1. spamassassin: 3.0.0. Clear:RC:1(192.168.3.10):. Processed in 0.088704 secs); 18 Feb 2005 09:08:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.3.10?) (192.168.3.10) by 0 with SMTP; 18 Feb 2005 09:08:50 -0000 Message-ID: <4215B07B.8010101@wingsofhermes.org> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:08:11 +1100 From: Berin Lautenbach User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: security-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: C++ lib support for SHA-256, etc.? References: <200502171557.j1HFvfkn021856@defang7.net.ohio-state.edu> In-Reply-To: <200502171557.j1HFvfkn021856@defang7.net.ohio-state.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Scott Cantor wrote: >>A thread on the W3C Dsig mailing list has begun to address the question >>of alternate algorithms (see >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2005JanMa >>r/0030.html), but has not gotten very far (yet). Maybe you should chime >>in. > > > Thanks for the pointer. I've been watching this since it started, and it hasn't really gone anywhere. So I've just given it a kick as I share the same concerns. BTW - I have compiled up OpenSSL 0.9.8-dev and managed to get it to link against the library (some minor changes to structure definitions that required some minor changes in the library). All the tests run fine, so I'm going to try to add 256/512 support over the weekend. If I'm feeling adventurous I might play with RIPEMD as well. I realise it's against the dev version of OpenSSL, but it's the best I can do without actually implementing the algs directly. (Which I can do if there is enough interest?) Cheers, Berin