From dev-return-6775-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@royale.apache.org Mon Oct 1 12:12:08 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CE16180660 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 12:12:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 80391 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2018 10:12:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@royale.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@royale.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@royale.apache.org Received: (qmail 80375 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2018 10:12:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 10:12:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 42F7E1A0072 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 10:12:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.75 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.75 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ=0.75, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xWiMhXwogFGC for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 10:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lj1-f173.google.com (mail-lj1-f173.google.com [209.85.208.173]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 09D425F3AD for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 10:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f173.google.com with SMTP id f8-v6so11590202ljk.1 for ; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 03:12:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Yae1K6VLgvcYWXYg30a697ojbrx92e43m4+xCsGYorE=; b=sx2V31mkyf+DH03MNskFYRU1LKD5vzP8NHxHUiincqUR2sgIFN3PGBQ8o3iXD30kUq RuoBwqu/WaWsONzCFcCamhhpkVWADjiOqN3jYGVMWWFoc44HXGg33BpjG29SO84b6uDd ub5SbmpHknXXAWxO0xsZ8qCnC/XFJa09nQ3lBF2yaslpFOprVVI6w3naA4nnNc/ExTQT bQhbPEGXXuq6HO/yItgDIbR4WFQ3RfGWAAota4FVPs+fYI7vG+2t8p/5IpOhOFZVmjQh Ii8wzqxlU2R9tBMBXD1m+rHd0y8MnLCoDAVlYZJwNb1hH3H27LwmIWsxIjEYrlKsjIRI +uaw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohFPGUPgHZLA0prRGKqYeyXw/N6uqTCC9r5QRrvKmiG16xEgnk/ 2qeaQkjqV4VSA1YV3WaIq8JwLXKFVshpeEJ2KAHqYDyZ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61TxUtCAtDzu/NeVtHRIfa2uPaack+LZjWVBnxn47D0W3+bUZBbae6/vk/YNCoXst/Fw1vuwTDjuBD8ycf90lw= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:921a:: with SMTP id k26-v6mr5773258ljg.163.1538388716452; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 03:11:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Carlos Rovira Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 12:11:45 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Trying to solve de flexunit problem when create the SDK with ANT To: dev@royale.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f8805d05772808a4" --000000000000f8805d05772808a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, I'm trying to figure the problem when we create an SDK with ANT before trying to fix Maven distribution to create an SDK. The problem: When doing "ant all" from royale-asjs folder at some point we get flexunit on "in" folder. Then inside that folder we have ; in/flexunit/flexunit/flexunit-4.2.0-20140410-as3_4.12.0.swc in/flexunit/flexunit/flexunit-4.2.0-20140410-flex_4.12.0.swc. I need to remove the second one or ant fails, since the process require the classes in as3 version swc Don't know how this is working for other people (I think Alex and Harbs doesn't have any problem at all). But others like Erik de Bruin or me found the ant process failing. So first of all is to know why the process is using one swc or another in different environments. I assume this is a problem of configuration at some place. The most easy way, but I think a bit "dirty", is trying to remove flex swc with ant as we get inside "in" folder, but I think we should try to understand why this is happen and try to bring a better fix. Thoughts? -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira --000000000000f8805d05772808a4--