From dev-return-7183-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@royale.apache.org Tue Oct 16 07:58:48 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id DF8F9180649 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:58:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 6475 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2018 05:58:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@royale.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@royale.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@royale.apache.org Received: (qmail 6464 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2018 05:58:46 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:58:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 966E8CA8DE for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:58:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.248 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ=0.75, KAM_LOTSOFHASH=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PGh6EFKhMqiI for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:58:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf1-f41.google.com (mail-lf1-f41.google.com [209.85.167.41]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 01C275F3D0 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:58:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-f41.google.com with SMTP id t22-v6so15915842lfb.7 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 22:58:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=TvZo99wMOBeuffeP0im5acvnPBnHmIbTMiZiUqfItdU=; b=hIT7EIdCm41aFFujlkC/MQyTHVeJjS6Ajd46JCODVcs4+ihOIllIyPIkPd/wFYAIz2 a+gAH7uLhDJtUMU7qdO9ji6w/Gc29guOfV2zvr2k4rEmdyxdOC3Lox0FhLNikpSN8Y/O 2Y+eEIFVw8Akb6FTck3eNOpvlXXbjkI9kqNSA0XYESO0C6ZuyuV6rFE2l2pTAXZ2hR9/ fI4FBdSZMj+xcQKMcbK0C14859Ji4ZLY3rUAywx8uU7bxeasomaicvYQjvDYNR7rMTcw sQwDLmCG1nWAcGQGXWaBsrkGWen1wlPbwVhOeOU2Zc61MNJLjBQyvANepw2taEhBtWB/ BV4g== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfojTvow+pnc2rBx8RVypax7OqQQlc82JpmOZf9MFJpK8RntybBIy DLtvpkdDMAisGosrSeSQaRT7VxIA0aIRpLU7htj86Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60kaPBPkAxq3A34i3gKeH2pkWEo9ZwM+w1BnLR0xuDESQqkOJDQmS1hOt7fBkCnOe4W/R9GBFpInw9PVDqTtVk= X-Received: by 2002:a19:ab1a:: with SMTP id u26-v6mr12339192lfe.103.1539669522192; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 22:58:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <053CCC67-2FEC-4E3F-8563-948CB31D7353@adobe.com> <9ABB7266-5AC0-4313-BB2A-7BB62C37B14C@adobe.com> <001FEF50-4C4F-4D1E-87E1-F10770981884@adobe.com> In-Reply-To: <001FEF50-4C4F-4D1E-87E1-F10770981884@adobe.com> From: Carlos Rovira Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:58:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Royale, Emulation, ResourceManager, and Flex To: dev@royale.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f11c730578523ef2" --000000000000f11c730578523ef2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Alex, it's strange to me that artifacts are not published, I could ask Chris Dutz what's the reason and see what is his response about it, and if we can if it will be very difficult to do. I think that seems to be the best way to go. El mar., 16 oct. 2018 a las 0:34, Alex Harui () escribi=C3=B3: > Hi Carlos, > > I do not think Apache Flex or Adobe Flex was ever published as Maven > artifacts. The link you referenced only seems to reference poms and not > binaries. There are no pom.xml files in the Apache Flex repo. > > AIUI, there is this thing called a Mavenizer that can take a Flex SDK and > generate Maven artifacts. It is in the flex-utilities repo. I think it > will put the artifacts in your internal repository, but I don't think > anyone from Adobe or Apache Flex has ever tried to push those artifacts t= o > Maven Central. I'm not sure what it would take to do that. > > So, I'm not sure what the right answer is. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > =EF=BB=BFOn 10/15/18, 3:20 PM, "Carlos Rovira" = wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > I searched on the nexus hosted inner company, but didn't try to find = it > outside. I thought Flex SDK was in maven central as well is not the > case? > For example a quick search shows [1] where I see 4.12 and 4.13 here, > and I > suppose those should have the RBs right? > > If is not the case, I think can we upload the latest 4.16.1 to maven > central? > > [1] > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fmvnrep= ository.com%2Fartifact%2Forg.apache.flex.framework%2Fflex-framework&dat= a=3D02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C44e9502768aa447c4e4508d632ec6449%7Cfa7b1= b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636752388204185273&sdata=3D2LH4UA= Mhn%2BK0J1V5FbkoOObBb4cYLiFs4PIyEy1dIP4%3D&reserved=3D0 > > > El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 22:57, Alex Harui > () > escribi=C3=B3: > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > Where did you get that artifact? I could not find it on Maven > Central. > > Maybe you ran the Mavenizer on a Flex SDK? If so, the question is > whether > > we want Maven users to have to use the Mavenizer. > > > > -Alex > > > > On 10/15/18, 1:38 PM, "Carlos Rovira" > wrote: > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > I was looking for maven resoucebundle in maven and we have > separate > > artifacts. an example: > > > > > > > /org/apache/flex/framework/framework/4.16.0/framework-4.16.0-es_ES.rb.swc > > > > So I think it should not be a problem in maven too, and we can > reuse > > from > > flex :) > > > > Best > > > > > > El dom., 14 oct. 2018 a las 23:56, Alex Harui > > () > > escribi=C3=B3: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just pushed support for old Flex resource bundles in > Royale. Some > > > people migrating old Flex apps will find it more convenient > and may > > even > > > require that [ResourceBundle] metadata works. > > > > > > The interesting piece of this is that we can use the Flex > resource > > bundles > > > as is. They don't need to be re-compiled by Royale from > .properties > > files. > > > > > > The question for us is about how to deal with downloading the= se > > bundles. > > > Right now, I've commented out [ResourceBundle] metadata and t= he > > > -library-path options that point to the Flex bundles until we > figure > > out > > > where to put them and how. > > > > > > I think for Ant, it is as simple as downloading a Flex SDK an= d > > grabbing > > > the bundles. The Royale build already grabs PixelBender. Th= e > Flex > > SDK > > > download is big, so it will slow up builds from scratch. > > > > > > For Maven, it is trickier. I don't think there are Maven > artifacts > > for > > > Flex resource SWCs. Does anybody know for sure, one way or > > another? If > > > not, we might manually publish the SWCs as artifacts. > > > > > > I'm not in favor of copying the Flex properties files into th= e > > Royale repo > > > and putting together Ant and Maven builds for them, but if so= me > > volunteer > > > wants to do it, I won't object, I just don't want to spend my > time > > doing > > > it, since these files should effectively be immutable. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fabout.m= e%2Fcarlosrovira&data=3D02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C44e9502768aa447c= 4e4508d632ec6449%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6367523882041= 85273&sdata=3Dl2OQ0iefgB1gXwj5ZsyLTDdLZE5RX%2FBMotCDQBkhPZs%3D&rese= rved=3D0 > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fabout.m= e%2Fcarlosrovira&data=3D02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C44e9502768aa447c= 4e4508d632ec6449%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6367523882041= 85273&sdata=3Dl2OQ0iefgB1gXwj5ZsyLTDdLZE5RX%2FBMotCDQBkhPZs%3D&rese= rved=3D0 > > > --=20 Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira --000000000000f11c730578523ef2--