royale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Proxy method calls with RemoteObject
Date Tue, 09 Oct 2018 10:42:26 GMT
Yes. Temporarily using a branch as a shim to keep working until a permanent solution is available
is something I’ve done more than once.

That’s the cost of working with bleeding edge… ;-)

Harbs

> On Oct 9, 2018, at 1:39 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Carlos,
> 
> You can always use branch, make your changes and wait for the proper one
> using branch. Some time ago Harbs did it the same as far as I remember.
> There is no need to wait if you need something ASAP.
> 
> Thanks,
> Piotr
> 
> wt., 9 paź 2018 o 12:36 Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org> napisał(a):
> 
>> Hi Alex,
>> 
>> since there's no planned ETA for anyone here (that I know), I could try at
>> some point to have a minimal Responder functionality in the current working
>> RO. Does not have sense to duplicate all the code but I think has sense to
>> see if some little changes can provide the minimal needs.
>> 
>> thanks
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> El mar., 9 oct. 2018 a las 0:25, Alex Harui (<aharui@adobe.com.invalid>)
>> escribió:
>> 
>>> I think you'll have to wait until someone gets all of the old Flex RO
>> code
>>> to compile and run.  I'm currently still debugging the compiler, so no
>> way
>>> it will be ready tomorrow.
>>> 
>>> It doesn't make sense to try to duplicate all of this code and get it to
>>> work some other way.
>>> 
>>> -Alex
>>> 
>>> On 10/8/18, 3:21 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrovira@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>    Hi Alex,
>>> 
>>>    I'm closing for today, but tomorrow I'll need to handle more than one
>>>    Responder for RemoteObject calls, so each operation/method can have
>>> it's
>>>    own responder and create methods for each one in my controllers. with
>>> the
>>>    current RemoteObject implementation could you share what could be the
>>> most
>>>    quick and easy way to get this while the full RO implementation is on
>>> the
>>>    works? Now that I'm starting to grow the app code base I can rely on
>> a
>>>    result handler full of if-then-else
>>> 
>>>    Thanks for any help on this
>>> 
>>>    Carlos
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    El lun., 8 oct. 2018 a las 18:52, Carlos Rovira (<
>>> carlosrovira@apache.org>)
>>>    escribió:
>>> 
>>>> Ok Alex, thanks, didn't know that you have this task to make it
>> work
>>> RO. I
>>>> though you only try to compile it.
>>>> That's good to know. I'm trying right now to make a real world app
>>> and
>>>> since I don't have a micro structural IOC framework like Swiz, that
>>> was
>>>> that I use in Flex, I'm trying to structure and organize screens,
>>>> controllers, delegates, and so on, and I'm trying to put things as
>>> easy as
>>>> possible so I can refactor more later to something more suited for
>>> this
>>>> task, since I don't have time now to build a framework for this due
>>> to
>>>> reduced time lines.
>>>> 
>>>> If you get this RO proxy way to call backend methods and
>> AsyncToken,
>>>> that's what I need to connect with MX RemoteObject in the same way
>>> we use
>>>> to do.
>>>> 
>>>> I'll be waiting for your. progress there
>>>> 
>>>> thanks
>>>> 
>>>> Carlos
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> El lun., 8 oct. 2018 a las 17:28, Alex Harui
>>> (<aharui@adobe.com.invalid>)
>>>> escribió:
>>>> 
>>>>> I believe I already said I am working on RemoteObject.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Flex compiler generates custom code for mx:RemoteObject.  The
>>> Royale
>>>>> Compiler currently does not.  I am working on it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/8/18, 3:13 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrovira@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>>    I was experimenting trying to get RemoteObject to proxy method
>>> calls.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    so instead of doing
>>>>> 
>>>>>    service.send("echo", [name_txt.text]);
>>>>> 
>>>>>    be able to do:
>>>>> 
>>>>>    service.echo(name_txt.text);
>>>>> 
>>>>>    I tried with Proxy class
>>>>> 
>>>>>    (org.apache.royale.utils.Proxy)
>>>>> 
>>>>>    and implementing IEventDispatcher, but compiler throws error:
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Call to a possibly undefined method echo through a reference
>>> with
>>>>> static
>>>>>    type RemoteObject.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    It's possible to do something like this? what I'm missing?
>>>>> 
>>>>>    This seems a little enhancement, but it would be cool if we
>> get
>>> it in
>>>>> order
>>>>>    to be more near of the normal syntax we all have in our code
>>> bases.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    thanks
>>>>> 
>>>>>    --
>>>>>    Carlos Rovira
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C84a4258241354233aeeb08d62d6c7081%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636746341103394266&amp;sdata=yVx9zWfP496aU9xnOJfjjS%2Flk88UaE0OY5SENAwT%2Fy8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Carlos Rovira
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C84a4258241354233aeeb08d62d6c7081%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636746341103394266&amp;sdata=yVx9zWfP496aU9xnOJfjjS%2Flk88UaE0OY5SENAwT%2Fy8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>>    --
>>>    Carlos Rovira
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C84a4258241354233aeeb08d62d6c7081%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636746341103394266&amp;sdata=yVx9zWfP496aU9xnOJfjjS%2Flk88UaE0OY5SENAwT%2Fy8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Piotr Zarzycki
> 
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*


Mime
View raw message