royale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
Date Sun, 02 Sep 2018 10:22:13 GMT
It looks like the merge from MXRoyale has problems.

DataContainerView has none of the changes that were done in MXRoyale (among other things)

DataContainerView got all the methods that were originally in DataContainerBase, but those changes did not survive the merge…

Fun, fun… ;-)

Harbs

> On Sep 2, 2018, at 12:59 PM, Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Now that I’m able to compile, I started testing the current state…
> 
> Why was DataContainerBase changed?
> 
> DataContainerBase.removeAllItemRenderers no longer exists. DataItemRendererFactoryForArrayList.dataProviderChangeHandler calls dataGroup.removeAllItemRenderers() on a List which now fails with a RTE because removeAllItemRenderers is undefined.
> 
>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 3:42 PM, Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I’ll try to work on it on Sunday.
>> 
>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 3:29 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Guys,
>>> 
>>> ANT and Maven build on branch is working right now. Please test your stuff.
>>> 
>>> Carlos,
>>> 
>>> Please take a look into RemoveTableItemRendererForArrayListData because I
>>> have commented out that line. Probably something won't work. Let me know
>>> how it's looks like.
>>> If you won't have time next wee let me know I will test Jewel on my own on
>>> Monday.
>>> 
>>> Alina,
>>> 
>>> I need your testing on that branch to make sure that I didn't break
>>> anything. I have merged all stuff from MXRoyale, so basically there is
>>> everything there.
>>> 
>>> Harbs,
>>> 
>>> I will be waiting for your changes which you have been talking about
>>> earlier.
>>> 
>>> Let's make this release happen!
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>> 
>>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 13:23 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>>> napisał(a):
>>> 
>>>> Harbs,
>>>> 
>>>> Can you jump to feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop and try build there? It
>>>> will help me with all of that. This branch contains merged develop and
>>>> MXRoyale.
>>>> I'm assuming you are using ANT.
>>>> 
>>>> As for that line in DataGridView I have change it to DataGridColumnList.
>>>> Please make changes if needed to something else on that branch. This branch
>>>> will be merged to develop once everyone tell me that I didn't break
>>>> anything. :)
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Piotr
>>>> 
>>>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 13:16 Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>>>> 
>>>>> The build passes for me on the latest develop branch using ant.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Are you building with ant or maven?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 2:13 PM, Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Scratch that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It does have an itemRenderer property and it inherits from
>>>>> IItemRendererProvider
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>> harbs.lists@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That change should be reverted. I added it to try and fix an issue
>>>>> with Express, but Express data grids don’t mix with Basic columns.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Some time ago you have added interface IDataGridColumnList [1]. It is
>>>>> used
>>>>>>>> here [2], couple of lines later there is assignment
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> list.itemRenderer = dataGridColumn.itemRenderer;
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> But that interface doesn't have itemRenderer property and build is
>>>>>>>> failing - locally. How actually it is working ?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as
>>>>> <
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229
>>>>> <
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 10:33 Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org
>>>>> <mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Piotr,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> for me its ok, but only want to point something important. I think
>>>>> we all
>>>>>>>>> invested many emails, hours in discussing about this. I think all
>>>>> positions
>>>>>>>>> are clear. I think we can discuss if things to bring to the plate
>>>>> are new,
>>>>>>>>> but I'm afraid it could not be. My position is that we all can get
>>>>> what we
>>>>>>>>> want. I think is: 1) return things to basic 2) jewel can't link
>>>>> basic, so
>>>>>>>>> it must create it's own versions. In case this could not be possible,
>>>>>>>>> create a JewelCore SWC. My latest experience creating Jewel versions
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> DateField, DateChooser, Table, ComboBox and DropDownList show that I
>>>>> was in
>>>>>>>>> the right track, since the things I copied are modified for Jewel
>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>> Jewel needs other things and implementations. In Basic there's too
>>>>> much of
>>>>>>>>> the styles and view hardcoded in the main code and that means that
>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> kind of code, for me, never can be generalistic piece of code that
>>>>> could be
>>>>>>>>> reusable for all UIs. As well it seems Basic UI, TLCs and CSS don't
>>>>> want to
>>>>>>>>> be separated and anyone wanting to extend it will need to deal with
>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>> dependencies, what is not acceptable. Framework code should help you
>>>>> to put
>>>>>>>>> the Pilars of other high level things without the need of looking
>>>>> how to
>>>>>>>>> workaround many things set up, this is what I find in Basic code when
>>>>>>>>> trying to use in Jewel. It could be a way if things could be change
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> Basic for the better, but seems that many people here things that
>>>>> Basic is
>>>>>>>>> now in a near-final-shape, so no changes means, (I at least), can
>>>>> use it.
>>>>>>>>> And Jewel can't use.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Don't see other way.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Let's see this as we end this release.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 7:27, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>>)
>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Please do not move anything more. I think I had enough problems with
>>>>>>>>>> current situations. I will deal with all of that as is.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> My suggestion is to restart discussion about all of that stuff after
>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:18 AM Carlos Rovira <
>>>>> carlosrovira@apache.org <mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> as we discussed, the package names was the revert we said to do, so
>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>> do a refactor of that package names, will be more consistent.
>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding movement of pieces, in the case of DataGroup I can move
>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>> Core to Basic and create a version for Jewel.
>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if this is ok for you.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> As well let me know if some more class is in Core to consider.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 19:18, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>>)
>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I was also thinking that this release won't have that changes, but
>>>>>>>>>>>> unfortunately they are there. I had big headache to make it
>>>>> working.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you Alex. I will try to deal with all of that.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 19:12 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
>>>>> <mailto:aharui@adobe.com.invalid>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I fixed the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale and merged it into
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> integration branch.  However, the Maven build in the integration
>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> still failing.  It appears to be because DataGroup got moved from
>>>>>>>>>> Basic
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Core.  The Ant build should be failing there too.  I was under
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> impression that these sorts of changes were not going to be in
>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.  Someone else will have to deal with resolving these
>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don’t want to stop my other work to figure them out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great! Thanks Alex!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 18:05 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
>>>>> <mailto:aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will fix the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale then you can
>>>>>>>>>> pull
>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes into the integration branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 7:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. I build repo only using ANT. Do you know how to fix
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> missed some conflicts, not sure why Maven complaining. :)
>>>>>>>>>> If
>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time I will look into that tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 16:24 Carlos Rovira <
>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrovira@apache.org <mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I switched to the feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then try to pass maven and fails just at the begining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I saw that has 2 rat check fails, so I fixed it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but now I'm seeing more problems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> col: 18 Error: interface method numItemRenderers in
>>>>>>>>>>> interface
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent not implemented by class DataGroup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea
>>>>>>>>>>>>> implements
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>              ^
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> col: 18 interface method numItemRenderers in interface
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not implemented by class DataGroup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea
>>>>>>>>>>>>> implements
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>              ^
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.666093134 seconds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> *------------------------------------------------------------------------*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary:*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Parent
>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT
>>>>>>>>>>> ....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.164 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework
>>>>>>>>>>> ...........................
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.273 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Fonts
>>>>>>>>>>> ....................
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.175 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs
>>>>>>>>>>> .....................
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.691 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Core
>>>>>>>>>>> ...............
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *FAILURE* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.947 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Binding
>>>>>>>>>>> ............
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SKIPPED*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm a bit confused. I thought the branch was
>>>>>>>>> compiling
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some point, but it seems that conflicts are still
>>>>>>>>>> unsolved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example in this error, seems MXRoyale introduced
>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>> MX
>>>>>>>>>>>>> API
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not in Royale core classes until now, so it needs to
>>>>>>>>> add
>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only reports this fails, but maybe when it reach Basic
>>>>>>>>>>>> library
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much more than that...so my question is, did you try to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> compile with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the branch? if so did you find this problems?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing something?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know in order to know how to operate. I'll
>>>>>>>>> return
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jewel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> duties
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the meanwhile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 16:04, Carlos Rovira (<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrovira@apache.org <mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of course, I'll try all Jewel examples and report if
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> find
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isuue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 15:33, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>>)
>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alina,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on preparation to release next version
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale. One
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps were to merge everything what is in MXRoyale
>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just finished it and everything what was in MXRoyale
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being merged to special branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Before I merge all that stuff back to develop I
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch to that branch and test on your end -
>>>>>>>>> whether I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your stuff. Is something is being missed - please
>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to that branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you switch to that branch as well and test some
>>>>>>>>>>> Jewel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to build Tour De Flex tomorrow to see
>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sie 2018 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrovira@apache.org <mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the recommended way is to create a integration
>>>>>>>>>> branch,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> moreover
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MXRoyale has gone many time in its own way. Then
>>>>>>>>>> solve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch until you see is stable and all is
>>>>>>>>> compiling
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected, then merge into develop the integration
>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 19:00, Alex Harui
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (<aharui@adobe.com.invalid <mailto:aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Master and agent have their own root folders for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects.  I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Agent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is running in c:\Jenkins\workspace and master
>>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wherever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> APPDATA is pointing.  In theory, royale-compiler
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-typedefs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should  be able to be built off master, and the
>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>> builds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use Ant variables to point to the results of
>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> builds.  If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to try switching everything off master to the
>>>>>>>>>> agent
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For me, there were some builds that would not
>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> master.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/18, 9:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see failing mustellaresultsparser [1]  [2]
>>>>>>>>>>> It's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pointing for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to c:/jenkins/workspace instead those one in
>>>>>>>>>>>> Program
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files. How
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is appear there ? What actually is
>>>>>>>>>>>> ${env.APPDATA} ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *[1] **
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>> <
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>> <
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *[2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Thanks,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Piotr*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:18 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give me some sign here once you
>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:12 Harbs <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> harbs.lists@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have found that there’s an error with
>>>>>>>>> ACE
>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only able to get it to build by first
>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ant on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typedefs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then the asjs repo succeeded.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my Mac, it worked fine, so I’m not
>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> triggered
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this is related to the failures on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dunno…
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan on making sure the current develop
>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>> works
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any issues that might crop up in the next
>>>>>>>>>>>> couple
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is also some code which needs to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-picked from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert-refactor branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:25 PM, Alex Harui
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I'd sent an email about this,
>>>>>>>>>>> but I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason, some weeks ago, the
>>>>>>>>>> builds
>>>>>>>>>>>>> began to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci.  The only way I was able
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkins
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent and move builds that needed the
>>>>>>>>>> screen
>>>>>>>>>>>> (to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In theory, royale-compiler and
>>>>>>>>>>> royale-typedefs
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the master build agent.  Any build issues
>>>>>>>>>>> here
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the right Ant variables in place.
>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point in time after I made the agent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, I think this issue is
>>>>>>>>>>> independent
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build.a.o
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Maven.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding releasing in general, I have
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> slight
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preference
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wait a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit until I get more of Tour De Flex
>>>>>>>>>> working,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't have to spend time figuring out the
>>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop, it doesn't matter to me.  I was
>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pondering just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releasing from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/18, 7:03 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have switched two build on jenkins
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "master"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs_jsonly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs - It seems that this
>>>>>>>>> fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can stay like that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working right now to fix build
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> module
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Icons.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 15:06 Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>> Zarzycki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to commit some changes to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> build.xml, if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 14:12 Piotr
>>>>>>>>>> Zarzycki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked into the current failing
>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Basedir
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs
>>>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist" and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct, because "royale-typedefs" is
>>>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "C:\Program
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone changed that and why ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niedz., 26 sie 2018 o 15:11 Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>> Zarzycki
>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to notify Infra about
>>>>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b.a.o.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Locally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything is perfectly fine. I will
>>>>>>>>>>>> attach
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> write
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users@infra.apache.org <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users@infra.apache.org>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 16:05 Carlos
>>>>>>>>>> Rovira <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrovira@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great Piotr!,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you said discussion is not over,
>>>>>>>>>>> but I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> almost
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things and plans was left for
>>>>>>>>>> releases
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3". In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fact I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package name changes that was the
>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3. So I think we are at this
>>>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>>>>>> safe to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to call it :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I must say that I'm this days
>>>>>>>>> wanting
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> finish
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Jewel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will make it pretty usable in an
>>>>>>>>>> stable
>>>>>>>>>>>>> way, for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> points are:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * End Jewel Table and Jewel List
>>>>>>>>>> remove
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel NumericStepper
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel DropdownList/Combobox
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's much more to do, but I
>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>> three
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> points
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people have the minimun to start
>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in real
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale Jewel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (at least is what I need to start a
>>>>>>>>>>> real
>>>>>>>>>>>>> project
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale, so I'm working hard to
>>>>>>>>>> complete
>>>>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> points).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to make this asap, so hope
>>>>>>>>>>>>> something of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 24 ago. 2018 a las 0:35,
>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zarzycki
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Om,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no objections to that. The
>>>>>>>>>>>> question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of view Maven which is I believe
>>>>>>>>> big
>>>>>>>>>>>> part
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complain. We will see.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for confirmation,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 00:25 OmPrakash
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muppirala <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:bigosmallm@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, since 0.9.3 was already
>>>>>>>>> pushed
>>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>>> via
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm [1],
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skip to 0.9.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:53 PM
>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zarzycki
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a while since last
>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to start process of releasing
>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right now. I know that we have
>>>>>>>>>>>> probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unfinished
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> core changes. I'm suggesting
>>>>>>>>> leave
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be release manager. I will
>>>>>>>>>> study
>>>>>>>>>>>>> carefully
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope to get help with all of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see that we have failing
>>>>>>>>>> typedefs
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleaned up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> workspace and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. If #576 fail I will ask
>>>>>>>>>> infra
>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advice. [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do I need to know anything in
>>>>>>>>> case
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestion here [3] is still up
>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about emulation branch -
>>>>>>>>> Can
>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything what can hold
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <
>>>>> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>
>>>>>>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <
>>>>> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>>*
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>> 
>>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> 
>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>> 
>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>> 
> 



Mime
View raw message