# royale-dev mailing list archives

##### Site index · List index
Message view
Top
Subject Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
Date Fri, 31 Aug 2018 22:57:03 GMT
```Please remember that an integration branch contains changes from two branches and when files get moved around, it is possible for changes to get out of sync.  What is in the develop branch may not be the "latest".

Thanks,
-Alex

﻿On 8/31/18, 8:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com> wrote:

I just merged to that branch latest changes from develop. Once you finish
whatever you are doing, switch there and play with it yourself. There is
nothing to discuss blindly before you didn't touch that branch.

Thanks,
Piotr

pt., 31 sie 2018 o 17:01 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
napisał(a):

> Carlos,
>
> I cannot change it because itemRendererParent field is type of IItemRendererParent
> [1] and that interface doesn't contains that method. Link [1] is pointing
> to develop branch, but that interfaces looks
> exactly the same in integration branch.
>
> [1]
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 16:19 Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org>
> napisał(a):
>
>> Piotr,
>> what I'm saying is that the whole fiel is created by me, and you have a
>> line of code that is different to what I have in develop. So something is
>> wrong in the merge to the integration branch. The line of code I'm posting
>> is the right one and the one you should have in the integration branch.
>>
>> I'm still on develop fixing the 4 things I commented. When I finish I'll
>> be
>> trying the integration branch. In the mean while, since that line is not
>> right, can you change it for the one I posted?, If not when I reach to the
>> integration branch I'll change it myself
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>>
>> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 15:43, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
>>
>> > Carlos,
>> >
>> > Are you using this branch ?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Above branch need to be tested and my previous link pointing to sources
>> > from that branch.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Piotr
>> >
>> > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 15:39 Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org>
>> > napisał(a):
>> >
>> > > Hi Piotr,
>> > >
>> > > I don't have that line:
>> > >
>> > > itemRendererParent.removeItemRenderer(processedRow);
>> > >
>> > > I have this in develop:
>> > >
>> > > itemRendererParent.removeElement(processedRow);
>> > >
>> > > How is this possible? is very strange :?
>> > >
>> > > The item renderer is removed in the loop, the last line is to remove
>> the
>> > > row (tr) element from the itemRendererParent (tbody)
>> > >
>> > > Can you change to this
>> itemRendererParent.removeElement(processedRow); ?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 15:31, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> > >
>> > > > No this is not that line. That's the next one which is commented
>> right
>> > > now.
>> > > > [1]. Uncomment line to see error. Maven is failing with error which
>> is
>> > > > valid[2]
>> > > >
>> > > > [1]
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Piotr
>> > > >
>> > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 15:23 Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org>
>> > > > napisał(a):
>> > > >
>> > > > > Piotr,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > let me see if I understand the problem. That line:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > itemRendererParent.removeItemRenderer(ir);
>> > > > >
>> > > > > is making compilation fail?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > That would be very strange since my compilation succeeded. and
>> seems
>> > > the
>> > > > > line is ok. If so it could be a similar problem to the one we saw
>> > > > recently
>> > > > > in witch compilation was ok localy but failing in the server.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Let me know about this problem to see what I should take care
>> > > > >
>> > > > > thanks!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Carlos
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 15:13, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi Carlos,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Ok understand. Thanks for explanation. If you could look into
>> that
>> > > how
>> > > > to
>> > > > > > achieve that without build fail that would be great.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Piotr
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 15:11 Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org
>> >
>> > > > > > napisał(a):
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi Piotr,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Table component uses TBodyContentArea as IContentView instead
>> of
>> > > > > > DataGroup,
>> > > > > > > so the IItemRendererParent needs its own implementation.
>> > > > > > > Inside TBody(<tbody>), we have each item render as a TableRow
>> > > (<tr>),
>> > > > > > that
>> > > > > > > has inside a TableCell (<td>) and then the TableItemRenderer.
>> > > > > > > So when adding, removing, and so on from the dataProvider to
>> > manage
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > item renderers you need to create or destroy this structure.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > So if you see the code, you'll that I'm removing the cells
>> inside
>> > > the
>> > > > > row
>> > > > > > > and the itemrender inside the cell so signaling the
>> appropriate
>> > > > removal
>> > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > listeners.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hope this explanation solve your doubt
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > thanks
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Carlos
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 12:50, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > > > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi Carlos,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Question to one of your class. Why are you doing two times
>> > > removing
>> > > > > [1]
>> > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > couple of lines later you are doing removeElement ? It
>> > shouldn't
>> > > > > event
>> > > > > > > work
>> > > > > > > > because there is no method removeElement in that interface.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > [1]
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > Piotr
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 12:18 Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com>
>> > > napisał(a):
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > That change should be reverted. I added it to try and fix
>> an
>> > > > issue
>> > > > > > with
>> > > > > > > > > Express, but Express data grids don’t mix with Basic
>> columns.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
>> > > > > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Hi Harbs,
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Some time ago you have added interface
>> IDataGridColumnList
>> > > [1].
>> > > > > It
>> > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > used
>> > > > > > > > > > here [2], couple of lines later there is assignment
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > list.itemRenderer = dataGridColumn.itemRenderer;
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > But that interface doesn't have itemRenderer property
>> and
>> > > build
>> > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > > failing - locally. How actually it is working ?
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > [1]
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > <
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > [2]
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > <
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > > Piotr
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 10:33 Carlos Rovira <
>> > > > carlosrovira@apache.org
>> > > > > > > > <mailto:
>> > > > > > > > > carlosrovira@apache.org>> napisał(a):
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> Piotr,
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >> for me its ok, but only want to point something
>> > important. I
>> > > > > think
>> > > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > > > all
>> > > > > > > > > >> invested many emails, hours in discussing about this. I
>> > > think
>> > > > > all
>> > > > > > > > > positions
>> > > > > > > > > >> are clear. I think we can discuss if things to bring to
>> > the
>> > > > > plate
>> > > > > > > are
>> > > > > > > > > new,
>> > > > > > > > > >> but I'm afraid it could not be. My position is that we
>> all
>> > > can
>> > > > > get
>> > > > > > > > what
>> > > > > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > > > >> want. I think is: 1) return things to basic 2) jewel
>> can't
>> > > > > > > basic,
>> > > > > > > > > so
>> > > > > > > > > >> it must create it's own versions. In case this could
>> not
>> > be
>> > > > > > > possible,
>> > > > > > > > > >> create a JewelCore SWC. My latest experience creating
>> > Jewel
>> > > > > > versions
>> > > > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > > >> DateField, DateChooser, Table, ComboBox and
>> DropDownList
>> > > show
>> > > > > > that I
>> > > > > > > > > was in
>> > > > > > > > > >> the right track, since the things I copied are modified
>> > for
>> > > > > Jewel
>> > > > > > > > since
>> > > > > > > > > >> Jewel needs other things and implementations. In Basic
>> > > there's
>> > > > > too
>> > > > > > > > much
>> > > > > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > > >> the styles and view hardcoded in the main code and that
>> > > means
>> > > > > that
>> > > > > > > > this
>> > > > > > > > > >> kind of code, for me, never can be generalistic piece
>> of
>> > > code
>> > > > > that
>> > > > > > > > > could be
>> > > > > > > > > >> reusable for all UIs. As well it seems Basic UI, TLCs
>> and
>> > > CSS
>> > > > > > don't
>> > > > > > > > > want to
>> > > > > > > > > >> be separated and anyone wanting to extend it will need
>> to
>> > > deal
>> > > > > > with
>> > > > > > > > > those
>> > > > > > > > > >> dependencies, what is not acceptable. Framework code
>> > should
>> > > > help
>> > > > > > you
>> > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > put
>> > > > > > > > > >> the Pilars of other high level things without the need
>> of
>> > > > > looking
>> > > > > > > how
>> > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > >> workaround many things set up, this is what I find in
>> > Basic
>> > > > code
>> > > > > > > when
>> > > > > > > > > >> trying to use in Jewel. It could be a way if things
>> could
>> > be
>> > > > > > change
>> > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > >> Basic for the better, but seems that many people here
>> > things
>> > > > > that
>> > > > > > > > Basic
>> > > > > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > >> now in a near-final-shape, so no changes means, (I at
>> > > least),
>> > > > > can
>> > > > > > > use
>> > > > > > > > > it.
>> > > > > > > > > >> And Jewel can't use.
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >> Don't see other way.
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >> Let's see this as we end this release.
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >> Carlos
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 7:27, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > > > > > > > > >> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>)
>> > > > > > > > > >> escribió:
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Hi Carlos,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Please do not move anything more. I think I had enough
>> > > > problems
>> > > > > > > with
>> > > > > > > > > >>> current situations. I will deal with all of that as
>> is.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> My suggestion is to restart discussion about all of
>> that
>> > > > stuff
>> > > > > > > after
>> > > > > > > > > >>> release.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Piotr
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:18 AM Carlos Rovira <
>> > > > > > > > carlosrovira@apache.org>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> as we discussed, the package names was the revert we
>> > said
>> > > to
>> > > > > do,
>> > > > > > > so
>> > > > > > > > > >> when
>> > > > > > > > > >>> we
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> do a refactor of that package names, will be more
>> > > > consistent.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Regarding movement of pieces, in the case of
>> DataGroup I
>> > > can
>> > > > > > move
>> > > > > > > it
>> > > > > > > > > >> from
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Core to Basic and create a version for Jewel.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Let me know if this is ok for you.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> As well let me know if some more class is in Core to
>> > > > consider.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 19:18, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> I was also thinking that this release won't have
>> that
>> > > > > changes,
>> > > > > > > but
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> unfortunately they are there. I had big headache to
>> > make
>> > > it
>> > > > > > > > working.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Thank you Alex. I will try to deal with all of that.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 19:12 Alex Harui
>> > > > > <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> napisał(a):
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> I fixed the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale and
>> merged
>> > > it
>> > > > > into
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> integration branch.  However, the Maven build in
>> the
>> > > > > > integration
>> > > > > > > > > >>> branch
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> is
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> still failing.  It appears to be because DataGroup
>> got
>> > > > moved
>> > > > > > > from
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Basic
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Core.  The Ant build should be failing there too.
>> I
>> > was
>> > > > > under
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> impression that these sorts of changes were not
>> going
>> > to
>> > > > be
>> > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > this
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> release.  Someone else will have to deal with
>> > resolving
>> > > > > these
>> > > > > > > > > >> issues.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> I
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> don’t want to stop my other work to figure them
>> out.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> -Alex
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On 8/30/18, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>> > > > > > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>    Great! Thanks Alex!
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>    czw., 30 sie 2018 o 18:05 Alex Harui
>> > > > > > > <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> napisał(a):
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I will fix the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale
>> then
>> > you
>> > > > can
>> > > > > > > > > >>> pull
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> those
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> changes into the integration branch.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> -Alex
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 7:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>> > > > > > > > > >>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>    Hi Carlos,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>    Nope. I build repo only using ANT. Do you know
>> how
>> > > to
>> > > > > fix
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> that
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> ?
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Probably I
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>    missed some conflicts, not sure why Maven
>> > > complaining.
>> > > > > :)
>> > > > > > > > > >>> If
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> you
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> won't
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> have
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>    time I will look into that tomorrow.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>    Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>    Piotr
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>    czw., 30 sie 2018 o 16:24 Carlos Rovira <
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> carlosrovira@apache.org
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>    napisał(a):
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I switched to the
>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> then try to pass maven and fails just at the
>> > begining
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I saw that has 2 rat check fails, so I fixed it
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> but now I'm seeing more problems
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39):
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> col: 18 Error: interface method numItemRenderers
>> in
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> interface
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent not implemented by class
>> > DataGroup
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>    public class DataGroup extends
>> > ContainerContentArea
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> implements
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>                 ^
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39):
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> col: 18 interface method numItemRenderers in
>> > interface
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> IItemRendererParent
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> not implemented by class DataGroup
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>    public class DataGroup extends
>> > ContainerContentArea
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> implements
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>                 ^
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 1.666093134 seconds
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*]
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> *------------------------------------------------------------------------*
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary:*
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*]
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Parent
>> > > > > > > > > >> 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> ....
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2.164 s]
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> ...........................
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 0.273 s]
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Fonts
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> ....................
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 1.175 s]
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> .....................
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 0.691 s]
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Core
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> ...............
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *FAILURE* [
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 1.947 s]
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Binding
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> ............
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SKIPPED*
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> So I'm a bit confused. I thought the branch was
>> > > > > > > > > >> compiling
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> and
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> tested
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> some point, but it seems that conflicts are still
>> > > > > > > > > >>> unsolved.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> For example in this error, seems MXRoyale
>> introduced
>> > > > > > > > > >> some
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> MX
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> API
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> that is
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> not in Royale core classes until now, so it
>> needs to
>> > > > > > > > > >> add
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> it.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> For now
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> it
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> only reports this fails, but maybe when it reach
>> > Basic
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> library
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> it
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> could be
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> much more than that...so my question is, did you
>> try
>> > > to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> compile with
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> maven
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the branch? if so did you find this problems?
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing something?
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Let me know in order to know how to operate. I'll
>> > > > > > > > > >> return
>> > > > > > > > > >>> to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> my
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jewel
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> duties
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> in the meanwhile
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks!
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Carlos
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 16:04, Carlos Rovira
>> (<
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> carlosrovira@apache.org
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> )
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> escribió:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> of course, I'll try all Jewel examples and
>> report
>> > if
>> > > > > > > > > >> I
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> find
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> some
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> isuue.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 15:33, Piotr
>> Zarzycki
>> > (<
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Alina,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm working on preparation to release next
>> version
>> > > > > > > > > >> of
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Royale. One
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of the
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> steps were to merge everything what is in
>> MXRoyale
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> branch
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> develop. I
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> just finished it and everything what was in
>> > MXRoyale
>> > > > > > > > > >>> and
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> develop
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> now is
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> being merged to special branch
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Before I merge all that stuff back to develop I
>> > > > > > > > > >> would
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> like
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> to ask
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> you to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> switch to that branch and test on your end -
>> > > > > > > > > >> whether I
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> didn't
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> break any
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> of
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> your stuff. Is something is being missed -
>> > > > > > > > > >> make
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> changes and
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> commit
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> to that branch.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Can you switch to that branch as well and test
>> > some
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Jewel
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> examples ?
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I will try to build Tour De Flex tomorrow to
>> see
>> > > > > > > > > >> what
>> > > > > > > > > >>> is
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> happen.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sie 2018 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira <
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> carlosrovira@apache.org>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the recommended way is to create a integration
>> > > > > > > > > >>> branch,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> moreover
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> since
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> MXRoyale has gone many time in its own way.
>> Then
>> > > > > > > > > >>> solve
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> conflicts in
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> that
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> branch until you see is stable and all is
>> > > > > > > > > >> compiling
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> and
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> working
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> fine
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> as
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> expected, then merge into develop the
>> integration
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> branch.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :)
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Carlos
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 19:00, Alex Harui
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> (<aharui@adobe.com.invalid
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> )
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Master and agent have their own root folders
>> for
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> projects.  I
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> think
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Agent
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is running in c:\Jenkins\workspace and master
>> > > > > > > > > >> may
>> > > > > > > > > >>> be
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> running
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> in
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wherever
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> APPDATA is pointing.  In theory,
>> royale-compiler
>> > > > > > > > > >>> and
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> royale-typedefs
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> should  be able to be built off master, and
>> the
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> other
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> builds
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> should
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> be
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> able
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to use Ant variables to point to the results
>> of
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> those
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> builds.  If
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> you
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> want
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to try switching everything off master to the
>> > > > > > > > > >>> agent
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> that's
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> fine as
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> well.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> For me, there were some builds that would not
>> > > > > > > > > >> run
>> > > > > > > > > >>> on
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> master.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> HTH,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/18, 9:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>    I see failing mustellaresultsparser [1]
>> [2]
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> It's
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> pointing for
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> some
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> reason
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>    to c:/jenkins/workspace instead those one
>> in
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Program
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Files. How
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> this
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> path
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>    is appear there ? What actually is
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> \${env.APPDATA} ?
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>    *[1] **
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>    <
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>    *[2]
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>    <
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>    *Thanks,*
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>    *Piotr*
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>    pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:18 Piotr Zarzycki <
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>    napisał(a):
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give me some sign here once you
>> > > > > > > > > >> will
>> > > > > > > > > >>> be
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> done
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> with all
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> your
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes!
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:12 Harbs <
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> harbs.lists@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have found that there’s an error with
>> > > > > > > > > >> ACE
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> on
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> multiple
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> machines.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> was
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only able to get it to build by first
>> > > > > > > > > >>> running
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> ant on
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> the
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> typedefs
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> repo and
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then the asjs repo succeeded.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my Mac, it worked fine, so I’m not
>> > > > > > > > > >>> really
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> sure what
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> triggered
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this is related to the failures on
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> apacheroyaleci?
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Dunno…
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan on making sure the current develop
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> branch
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> works
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> for me
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> and
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fixing
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any issues that might crop up in the next
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> couple
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> of
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> days.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is also some code which needs to be
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> cherry-picked from
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert-refactor branch.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:25 PM, Alex Harui
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I'd sent an email about this,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> but I
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> can't
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> find it
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> so I
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> guess
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason, some weeks ago, the
>> > > > > > > > > >>> builds
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> began to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> fail
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> on
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci.  The only way I was able
>> > > > > > > > > >> to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> fix
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> it was
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> create a
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkins
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent and move builds that needed the
>> > > > > > > > > >>> screen
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> (to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> run
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> tests)
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> agent.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In theory, royale-compiler and
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> royale-typedefs
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> should
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> still
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> be
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> able
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to use
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the master build agent.  Any build issues
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> here
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> are
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> probably a
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> matter of
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the right Ant variables in place.
>> > > > > > > > > >>> I
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> think it
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> did all
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> work
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> at one
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> point in time after I made the agent.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, I think this issue is
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> independent
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> of any
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> issues
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> on
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> build.a.o
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Maven.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding releasing in general, I have
>> > > > > > > > > >> a
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> slight
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> preference
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wait a
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit until I get more of Tour De Flex
>> > > > > > > > > >>> working,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> but if
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I'm not
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RM
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't have to spend time figuring out the
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> merge
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> from
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop, it doesn't matter to me.  I was
>> > > > > > > > > >>> also
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> pondering just
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> releasing from
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/18, 7:03 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>>
>> > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   I have switched two build on jenkins
>> > > > > > > > > >>> to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> "master"
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs_jsonly
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   royale-asjs - It seems that this
>> > > > > > > > > >> fixes
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> issue with
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> build. -
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Not
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   can stay like that.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   I'm working right now to fix build
>> > > > > > > > > >> for
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> module
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Icons.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Piotr
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   pon., 27 sie 2018 o 15:06 Piotr
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Zarzycki <
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   napisał(a):
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to commit some changes to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> build.xml, if
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> it won't
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> work
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I will
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert it.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 14:12 Piotr
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Zarzycki <
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked into the current failing
>> > > > > > > > > >> build
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> [1].
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> It
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> complaining
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Basedir
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs
>> > > > > > > > > >>> does
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> not
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> exist" and
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> it
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct, because "royale-typedefs" is
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> being
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> build
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to that
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> folder
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "C:\Program
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs".
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone changed that and why ?
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niedz., 26 sie 2018 o 15:11 Piotr
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Zarzycki
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> <
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to notify Infra about
>> > > > > > > > > >>> problem
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> with
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> build on
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> b.a.o.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Locally
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything is perfectly fine. I will
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> attach
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> dev
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> list and
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> write
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> email
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users@infra.apache.org <mailto:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> users@infra.apache.org>.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 16:05 Carlos
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Rovira <
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrovira@apache.org
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great Piotr!,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you said discussion is not over,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> but I
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> think
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> we
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> discussed
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> almost
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things and plans was left for
>> > > > > > > > > >>> releases
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> "post
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> 0.9.3". In
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> fact I
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package name changes that was the
>> > > > > > > > > >>> only
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> point
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> that was
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> making
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> us not
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3. So I think we are at this
>> > > > > > > > > >>> point
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> safe to
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> release
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.4
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to call it :)
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I must say that I'm this days
>>
>

--

Piotr Zarzycki