royale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Container change
Date Sun, 06 May 2018 08:02:30 GMT
Hi Harbs,

I'm seeing as well that Container can return to Basic, and ContainerBase be
in Core. I think it was part of the hard fight I had to do to deal with the
refactoring.
ItemRendererMouseController not sure, maybe can be as well in Basic and a
copy in Jewel... I'll be in my computer in an hour or so and can look at it.

As I said in my email, normaly this problems can be fixed just upgrading
package namespaces to the new ones. I think some isolated issues can arise
like this, but I think this change is important, more thinking to reach a
1.0 and settle the API for many time, so for that reason I want to do this
now that Jewel is still with few components.

btw, just to notice, I'm seeing all jewel examples reduced to 40% in size
thanks to this change. Since Basic was carrying a lot of unused stuff.



2018-05-06 9:14 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com>:

> org.apache.royale.html.beads.controllers.ItemRendererMouseController was
> changed to the core package as well (which also broke my app)
>
> I did not notice discussion about this. Why the package name change? How
> many more changes were there like this?
>
> Harbs
>
> > On May 6, 2018, at 10:07 AM, Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Why did Container become org.apache.royale.core.Container instead of
> org.apache.royale.html.Container?
> >
> > Why is Container Core at all?
> >
> > This change broke my app. While it’s not a big deal to fix it, I don’t
> understand why the change. Unless we decide on a wholesale change of
> components, this seems like a gratuitous breaking change for no good reason.
> >
> > Harbs
>
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message