royale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.9.3 Release
Date Fri, 20 Apr 2018 19:24:34 GMT
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Jewel is in the develop branch and some updates are in MXRoyale that I
> will merge to develop after I finish reviewing Alina's PRs from last night.
>
> What problems are you having with the nightly?  We should iron those out
> before starting an RC.
>

I mentioned it here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/994a7665521cc4a64b99a5fe00ef13d9b7205ea413d3acfdc4515e3b@%3Cdev.royale.apache.org%3E


>
> You are more than welcome to be the RM, especially if you are going to try
> the releasecandidate.xml scripts.  I am hopeful that some day cutting a
> release will be straightforward.  I will warn you that there might be some
> version number issues due to some recent changes in the Maven poms so make
> sure you have the time for it.
>

Sure, I would get like to get my hands dirty with this.  Unless you are on
a strict timeline to release?

Thanks,
Om


>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> ´╗┐On 4/20/18, 9:24 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     I would really like to see Jewel in this release.  The nightly builds
> dont
>     work for me and I am blocked because of this.
>
>     BTW, can I be the release manager for this one?
>
>     Thanks,
>     Om
>
>     On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 8:53 AM Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>     > Hi Piotr,
>     >
>     > What kinds of impact are you concerned about?  I think Jewel should
> be
>     > independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the
> default
>     > look for MXRoyale some day.
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     > -Alex
>     >
>     > On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Hi Alex,
>     >
>     >     I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may
> affect
>     > build,
>     >     for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
>     >
>     >     Thanks,
>     >     Piotr
>     >
>     >     2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrovira@apache.org>:
>     >
>     >     > Hi Alex,
>     >     >
>     >     > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >:
>     >     >
>     >     > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
>     >     > >
>     >     > >
>     >     > yep! :)))
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the
> MXRoyale
>     > branch.
>     >     > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a
>     > release.  We
>     >     > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in
> MXRoyale
>     > since
>     >     > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in
> MXRoyale
>     > will
>     >     > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
>     >     > >
>     >     > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we
> should
>     >     > release
>     >     > > what we have.  It shouldn't have impact on other component
> sets.
>     > What do
>     >     > > others think?
>     >     > >
>     >     >
>     >     > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale,
> but I
>     > think
>     >     > is a good time
>     >     > to see what will be merged
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > >
>     >     > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to
> create a
>     > common
>     >     > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel.
> Or it
>     > could
>     >     > > wait until next month.
>     >     > >
>     >     >
>     >     > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes
> stuff,
>     > we
>     >     > should consider to remove "themes"
>     >     > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same
> way as
>     >     > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build
> royale-asjs).
>     >     > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first
> build
>     > themes
>     >     > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
>     >     >
>     >     > Regarding  to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I
> think
>     > this
>     >     > should not stop these release, since is something internal
>     >     > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my
> plate
>     > and
>     >     > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
>     >     >
>     >     > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release
>     >     >
>     >     > thanks
>     >     >
>     >     > Carlos
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
>     >     > >
>     >     > > Thoughts?
>     >     > > -Alex
>     >     > >
>     >     > >
>     >     > >
>     >     > >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > --
>     >     > Carlos Rovira
>     >     >
>     > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
> DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     --
>     >
>     >     Piotr Zarzycki
>     >
>     >     Patreon: *
>     > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
>     >     <
>     > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
>     > >*
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message