royale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Refactoring Layouts
Date Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:41:15 GMT
Let's focus on things what Alex is proposing and eventually move all
discussion about Grid vs Flex Box to separate things. I believe the things
which he is going to do is also really important.

2018-02-26 9:36 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>:

> I would also not go with the assumption that Grid will/can replace Flex
> box. It's just different system for layouts. They can both work well
> together. IMO we didn't even get out all possibilities of Flex Box, so
> getting on board Grid is a lot of work. I was thinking during my work on
> website to create some set of layouts which utilize Flex Box, but it ends
> up that easier to me was just create css class.
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
> 2018-02-26 9:31 GMT+01:00 Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com>:
>
>> Yes. Grid is better than Flexbox for most things, but going with grid
>> really depends on what browsers we’re supporting.
>>
>> IE 10 and 11 do support grid, but their support for grid is based on an
>> old spec. Edge got support for grid only recently.
>>
>> https://rachelandrew.co.uk/archives/2016/11/26/should-i-try-
>> to-use-the-ie-implementation-of-css-grid-layout/ <
>> https://rachelandrew.co.uk/archives/2016/11/26/should-i-try
>> -to-use-the-ie-implementation-of-css-grid-layout/>
>> https://gridbyexample.com/browsers/ <https://gridbyexample.com/browsers/>
>>
>> > On Feb 26, 2018, at 9:43 AM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Alex,
>> >
>> > two things here:
>> >
>> > 1) while reading about css layouts seems Grid system is the most
>> > sophisticated one and is better than flexbox, so I think we should
>> change
>> > to that since flex box does not support some layouts and Grid seems the
>> > future and more like what we had in flex
>> >
>> > 2) yesterday making a simple blog example I put a vertical layout in a
>> view
>> > and a simple Js:button in SWF version button gets all the horizontal
>> space
>> > while in js is not affected. I think this differences must be removed
>> since
>> > if we post some example with both versions, both must be visuals equal
>> (as
>> > much as we can), but this difference is huge
>> >
>> >
>> > 2018-02-26 6:39 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Time for another refactoring of layout.  My goal for this round is to
>> move
>> >> the border/padding/margin calculations into the ValuesManager, and get
>> the
>> >> JS version to use getComputedStyle.  I think it will be cleaner to
>> >> abstract the differences between SWF and JS in the ValuesManager and
>> allow
>> >> for different IValuesImpls to have different levels of sophistication
>> for
>> >> SWF.
>> >>
>> >> Right now, our "FlexibleChild" layouts are not factoring in margins
>> >> correctly.
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts?
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Carlos Rovira
>> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message