royale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: Migrating existing FlexJS documentation to Royale
Date Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:36:46 GMT
I haven't been testing locally.  I just push it and build it on the CI
server.

I will look into building it locally.  On the CI server, we are only using
"Jekyll build" and not "Jekyll serve".  And you will probably have to use
a custom config file to override the default baseurl.

Right now, the site is so small that it builds really quickly, so I don't
think I care if you also just push/build/test.  Just let us know when you
are in there so we don't make other changes to the files.

I'll post instructions for local builds once I figure it out.

-Alex

On 1/24/18, 2:51 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org> wrote:

>Thanks Alex,
>I can see it working online :)
>I'm trying to test it localy but don't know how to do it.
>In order to make the html/css looks good, I need to work localy, please
>let
>me know how yo do it
>I installed already ruby, jekyll, etc... and tried to run "bundle exec
>jekyll serve" but we don't have Gem file result is:
>
>Could not locate Gemfile or .bundle/ directory
>
>Maybe there's a more easy way to test this.
>
>Carlos
>
>
>2018-01-19 21:59 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>:
>
>> OK, I got the CSS to load.  You can hit this link:
>>
>> 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.g
>>ithub.io%2Froyale-docs%2Ftest%2Ftest.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.c
>>om%7Cef158780d4714a61dfb908d5637d039e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%
>>7C0%7C0%7C636524310941764543&sdata=mD2KTprJ9GvEsEjVw1k256pI8yq0BbP%2F%2Bo
>>DkQhpAckI%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> I'm going to look into automatic TOC generation next.  IMO, we should
>> decide what kind of header/footer we want not only for the docs on this
>> site, but for ASDoc and Olaf's TryItNow as well and start implementing
>>it.
>>  Like this page, it may not look great right away, but we can iterate
>> towards making it look good.
>>
>> My 2 cents,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 1/19/18, 1:10 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>> >I'm out of time for today, but I tested templates and jekyll and
>>started
>> >to get something to work.
>> >
>> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fapache.gi
>> >thub.io%2Froyale-docs%2Ftest%2Ftest.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
>> 40adobe.com
>> >%7C8d9c2ab112564497fb2608d55f1c7c23%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0
>> >%7C0%7C636519498299260185&sdata=2egj2BghYos4ur%
>> 2FUSpvN4Vrzh8IOj6rPngvyAJe8
>> >ZqM%3D&reserved=0
>> >
>> >You can see the test/test.md and _layouts/docpage.html in the
>>royals-docs
>> >repo.  The CSS file didn't load for some reason.  Feel free to figure
>>it
>> >out or I will look into it tomorrow.
>> >
>> >HTH,
>> >-Alex
>> >
>> >On 1/18/18, 6:08 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>> >
>> >>This is for doc, not code so I'm not sure the issue I raised matters.
>> >>
>> >>That said, I've been reading this [1] and it seems like we should be
>>able
>> >>to set up a few templates sort of like we did flex.a.o and not worry
>>so
>> >>much about customizing a third-party theme.
>> >>
>> >>[1]
>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fjekyllrb
>> >>.
>> >>com%2Fdocs&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C6fca45a581614f01bbd008d55e
>> >>e
>> >>190da%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636519245260410634&sda
>> >>t
>> >>a=SnZeokcfQXRyaHs338A04ENYTLx%2FWSwo42KPSsA3S9k%3D&reserved=0
>> >>
>> >>On 1/18/18, 5:28 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>Carlos,
>> >>>
>> >>>I like your findings jeckyll theme doc.
>> >>>
>> >>>It looks like we may have again similar issue with license as we
>>have in
>> >>>MDLExample.
>> >>>
>> >>>Can someone raise jira for both cases? Alex raises question on legal
>> >>>couple
>> >>>of days ago. No responses. Let's not wait block us with it - push
>>things
>> >>>forward. Jira could be better to do this.
>> >>>
>> >>>Thanks,
>> >>>Piotr
>> >>>
>> >>>On Fri, Jan 19, 2018, 02:08 Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
>> >>>wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> > I think this looks very good and seems to be responsive
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>>[1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2Fmist
>> >>>>i
>> >>>>c
>> 
>>>>>>100.github.io%2Fjekyll-bootstrap-doc&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.co
>>>>>>m
>> %
>> >>>>7
>> >>>>C
>> >>>>9c168d0de9074f2fc06108d55edbea4f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0
>> >>>>%
>> >>>>7
>> >>>>C0%7C636519220978547047&sdata=cUfWYBGYEBBEd%
>> 2FpwSfe9bxwJd6N%2BmnyMC0pK%
>> >>>>2
>> >>>>F
>> >>>>EepY8o%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>> > [2]
>> >>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub
>> >>>>.
>> >>>>c
>> >>>>om%2Fallejo%2Fjekyll-docs-theme&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>> %7C9c1
>> >>>>6
>> >>>>8
>> >>>>d0de9074f2fc06108d55edbea4f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%
>> >>>>7
>> >>>>C
>> >>>>636519220978547047&sdata=hY3xQXdzTO8RFF7COWVNJtd%
>> 2BzoXqck04VV68TxcIKFs%
>> >>>>3
>> >>>>D
>> >>>>&reserved=0
>> >>>>
>> >>>> From a quick look this contains CSS code licensed under CC-BY-3.0
>> >>>>(looks
>> >>>> like it comes from bootstrap docs). That may or may not be an
>>issue,
>> >>>> depending on the current conversation around this on legal discuss,
>> >>>>and
>> >>>> what you want to do with it.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> Justin
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Carlos Rovira
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
>Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cef158780d4714a61dfb908d5
>637d039e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636524310941764543&s
>data=J7QoUjj3VjvkcYhHaGAdqW3%2B8XU0a2ctG04LorBuYWI%3D&reserved=0

Mime
View raw message