royale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: Distinguish description in "royale-sdk-description.xml" between asjs and JSOnly
Date Sat, 30 Dec 2017 00:00:41 GMT
Who is using royale-sdk-description?  They can ask for whatever they want
in there if it can be scripted.  Flash Builder is stuck using
flex-sdk-description and the format of the file probably can't be tweaked.

IMO, the "JSOnly" package probably shouldn't list FPxx.x and AIRxx.x since
those SDKs aren't involved.  I'd rather we start listing what the output
targets are instead of saying "Only".  So either just "js" or nothing at
all, and add "swf" when SWF support is packaged.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 12/29/17, 4:57 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi Guys,
>
>When I have in the Moonshine on the SDK list both versions of SDK - asjs
>and JSOnly the description in "royale-sdk-description.xml" do not
>distinguish between type of SDKs.
>
>Is it a good idea to change the name of the JSOnly SDK to the following
>one:
>
><name>Apache Royale 0.9.0 FP11.7 AIR14.0 en_US *(JSOnly)*</name>
>
>What do you think ?
>
>Thanks,
>-- 
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon: 
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cea0b0018d78c49
>9e2b2208d54ebbcb6f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6365014908
>50548663&sdata=q8PIJ71EOzJWMwdh23xBrejhmoHteryksSpohAOOxGg%3D&reserved=0
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cea0b0018d78c49
>9e2b2208d54ebbcb6f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6365014908
>50548663&sdata=q8PIJ71EOzJWMwdh23xBrejhmoHteryksSpohAOOxGg%3D&reserved=0>*

Mime
View raw message