royale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: Repos and Releases
Date Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:03:59 GMT
Hi Piotr,

They don't 'need' to stay.  It is a trade-off between download size and
simplicity of the packaging script.  I just want to make sure download
size matters to people before doing that work.

What do folks think?
-Alex

On 12/13/17, 1:09 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com> wrote:

>Alex,
>
>If they need they can stay. I just thought that this is something which we
>did omit during renaming.
>
>Piotr
>
>2017-12-13 20:54 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>:
>
>> The JSOnly package doesn't have Language.swc and other SWF support SWFs.
>> The difference between Language.swc and LanguageJS.swc is that the
>> Language.swc has definitions compiled with COMPILE::SWF,true.
>>
>> I've adjusted the templates to look for LanguageJS.swc first.
>>
>> Piotr, why is it important to remove the target folders?  They are
>>created
>> as part of the Ant build.  A SWC is output in the target folder then
>> copied to frameworks/libs or frameworks/js/libs.  Are you just trying to
>> save some size of the package?  What do others think about filtering
>>these
>> out of the binary package?   Right now, no binaries are explicitly
>> filtered out of the source package build before creating the binary
>> package.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 12/13/17, 2:30 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayjobs@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Note that I downloaded the binary version. Maybe building the src will
>> >result in a duplication.
>> >
>> >> In your
>> >>case it is weird that you don't have Language.swc in place.
>> >
>> >
>> >2017-12-13 10:40 GMT+01:00 Yishay Weiss <yishayjobs@hotmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> My mistake, I downloaded the regular version, not the jsonly
>>version. So
>> >> now I’m able to configure royale-asjs as a js-only sdk, and run
>>launch
>> >> configurations. The problem I’m seeing now [1] is that Language.swc
>> >>isn’t
>> >> where jsc thinks it should be (I have it under
>> >>C:\dev\royale\royale-asjs\
>> >> frameworks\projects\Language\target)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [1]
>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.ap
>> >>ache.org%2Ffb3I&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C6c1b1a5764ed4b58c02f0
>> >>8d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C6364875782221544
>> >>09&sdata=4nofhHTHjmmfJb93tdcB3wWGZIgOIgF3GSQHSjqGtLw%3D&reserved=0
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ________________________________
>> >> From: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:38:41 PM
>> >> To: dev@royale.apache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: Repos and Releases
>> >>
>> >> Actually, it was:
>> >>
>> >> cd royale-asjs/ide/flashbuilder
>> >> ant -f antscripts.xml setup
>> >>
>> >> I have updated the wiki to reflect this.  I was able to import the
>> >>jsonly
>> >> SDK and create a new project that compiled without errors.
>> >>
>> >> I'll be looking into the code-assist issue next.
>> >>
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 12/12/17, 9:24 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On 12/12/17, 7:20 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayjobs@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>Ok, I guess I was missing some context. Piotr’s upthread [1] link
>> >>made it
>> >> >>clear to me what the topic was about…
>> >> >>
>> >> >>So yes, royale-asjs siblings are recognized and it builds fine with
>> >>ant
>> >> >>all.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>I tried following the wiki for making it work with FB [2] and ran
>>into
>> >> >>some trouble.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  1.  The external tools under ide/flashbuilder have references
to
>> >> >>$ROYALE_HOME (e.g.  stringAttribute
>> >> >>key="org.eclipse.ui.externaltools.ATTR_LOCATION"
>> >> >>value="$ROYALE_HOME/ide/flashbuilder/antscripts.xml"/). I’m not
>>sure
>> >>if
>> >> >>these are place holders for the build, or something that’s
>>supposed to
>> >> >>work on mac but on my windows machine I had to replace them with
>>the
>> >> >>explicit path.
>> >> >
>> >> >Yes, the instructions for FB usage needs updating.  I think you
>>have to
>> >> >do:
>> >> >
>> >> >cd ide/flashbuilder
>> >> >ant -f antscripts.xml
>> >> >
>> >> >Before importing the external tools.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>  2.  Code completing wasn’t working. Remembering this [3]
>>discussion
>> >>I
>> >> >>tweaked flex-config.xml and am now getting tag completion in mxml,
>>but
>> >> >>not in AS3 scripts. I’m seeing this [4] in the FB log.
>> >> >
>> >> >It is still on my list to try to fix this.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>One thing I’m not clear about, which is related to (b) is whether
>>we
>> >>can
>> >> >>use FB and similar IDEs with a JS only package. I had to run
>> >> >>InstallAdobeSDKs.xml which copies depends on playerglobal.swc and
>>AIR
>> >>so
>> >> >>I’m guessing it needs flash.
>> >> >
>> >> >The JSOnly package should work in FB.  I'll try it again and see
>>why it
>> >> >failed.
>> >> >
>> >> >-Alex
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Thanks.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>[1]
>> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> http%3A%2F%2Fapachefle
>> >> >>x
>> >> >>build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%
>> >> 2FlastSuccessfulBuild%2Fart
>> >> >>i
>> >> >>fact%2Fout%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> >> 7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d
>> >> >>5
>> >> >>4173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> >> 7C636486888529206710&
>> >> >>s
>> >> >>data=4nfCQSPt9m3hp%2FqvZOGoPPvOk%2FdrzX0NARCILiOinNc%3D&reserved=0
>> >> >>[2]
>> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>> >> >>o
>> >> >>m%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FFlash-Builder-4.7&
>> >> data=02%7C01%7Caharui
>> >> >>%
>> >> >>40adobe.com%7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d54173ee6d%
>> >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
>> >> >>7
>> >> >>8decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486888529206710&sdata=
>> >> Qdb0wUJFEhh%2BnnUZZiUVDXNHeLzB
>> >> >>R
>> >> >>%2FwV7d%2BmFsRxKmw%3D&reserved=0
>> >> >>[3]
>> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fl
>> >> >>e
>> >> >>x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FLAST-CALL-
>> >> Release-FlexJS-FalconJX-0
>> >> >>-
>> >> >>8-0-tp61275p61654.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> >> 7Cf4463649f2fe48
>> >> >>c
>> >> >>9b0b708d54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364868885
>> >> >>2
>> >> >>9206710&sdata=rgtHk9T02d4%2BqFNjRiomfNph0KAZFmPv0bkFdl7P
>> >> 7xw%3D&reserved=0
>> >> >>[4]
>> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.ap
>> >> >>a
>> >> >>che.org%2Fmb8f&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> >> 7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708
>> >> >>d
>> >> >>54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> >> 7C636486888529206710
>> >> >>&
>> >> >>sdata=7zxTC0iyY5U6yDi9qUU0JKm5%2Fi6Q8Tz9v3BHmQ2cuVY%3D&reserved=0
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aharui@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> >> >>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:15 AM
>> >> >>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
>> >> >>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>On 12/12/17, 12:06 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayjobs@hotmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>I’m trying to understand what’s going on here, so I’ll
ask some
>>naïve
>> >> >>>questions:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>  1.  Are royale-compiler and royale-typedefs supposed to be
>>merged
>> >>into
>> >> >>>royale-asjs?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>The current package doesn't "merge" as much as it co-packages all
3
>> >>repos
>> >> >>into one package.  IOW, the package has 3 subfolders (royale-asjs,
>> >> >>royale-compiler, royale-typedefs).
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>  2.  If so, why does running ant all from royale-asjs clone
said
>> >>repos?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>It depends on what you tried.  If you just cloned royale-asjs and
>>run
>> >> >>"ant
>> >> >>all", the script will still clone the repos, but for me, if I run
>>"ant
>> >> >>all" in the royale-asjs folder of the nightly source package, it
>> >>doesn't
>> >> >>clone the repos as it finds royale-compiler and royale-typedefs.
>>Of
>> >> >>course, something might have broken so I will verify that tomorrow.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>  3.  “Folks should have noticed that the
>> >> >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the
binary
>> >> >>>package.” What’s the path to that folder?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>royale-asjs
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>  4.  Will my IDE (Flash Builder) recognize changes I make to
the
>> >> >>>framework, in other words will re-building the framework from
>> >>modified
>> >> >>>source update this (3) folder?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>I'm not sure what configuration you are trying, but the source
>>package
>> >> >>really is like packaging up the parent folder of the 3 repos and
>>the
>> >> >>binary package is really like packaging up the parent folder of
>>the 3
>> >> >>repos after building everything.   So if changes are detected
>>today,
>> >>they
>> >> >>should be in this package too.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>HTH,
>> >> >>-Alex
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aharui@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> >> >>>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:03 AM
>> >> >>>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
>> >> >>>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>I think I have the packaging scripts set up to package the 3
repos
>> >>into
>> >> >>>a
>> >> >>>single source package.  The nightly builds for the past few
days
>>have
>> >> >>>been
>> >> >>>churning out this new package.  Folks should have noticed that
the
>> >> >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the
binary
>> >> >>>package.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>I'll be spending a bit more time on some final checks (like
>>execute
>> >>bits
>> >> >>>on the scripts) but I think we're at the point where others
should
>> >> >>>review
>> >> >>>the package to see if they like it or not and report things
that
>>need
>> >> >>>improvement.  If we want to bake in NPM artifact generation
into
>>the
>> >> >>>scripts, we should get going on that now.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>Once we get consensus that this package structure is the one
we
>>want
>> >>to
>> >> >>>release, the next thing to try is to create a release candidate.
>>My
>> >> >>>current thinking is to use Maven to generate its per-repo source
>> >> >>>packages
>> >> >>>and alter the Ant script to grab the 3 packages and run the
>>release
>> >> >>>script
>> >> >>>in those packages.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>Constructive feedback welcome,
>> >> >>>-Alex
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>On 12/5/17, 11:42 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>Ok I will wait for your final push to develop. In any case
it
>>looks
>> >> >>>>good
>> >> >>>>till now.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>Once you update Readme I can make a build - I haven't done
ant
>>build
>> >> >>>>for
>> >> >>>>a
>> >> >>>>while.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>Thanks, Piotr
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, 08:38 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>> Hi Piotr,
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> I have all 3 feature/rename branches merged into the
develop
>> >>branch
>> >> >>>>> locally.  I'm not sure it is necessary to merge the
other way
>> >>first,
>> >> >>>>> especially in royale-asjs because most of the changes
were in
>>the
>> >> >>>>>compiler.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> I was going to push it tomorrow (for me) so I can babysit
the
>>CI
>> >> >>>>>servers
>> >> >>>>> if they don't pass since I haven't tested the merge
on Windows
>> >>(the
>> >> >>>>>CI
>> >> >>>>> server has built and ran tests on Windows on feature/rename).
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> I can hold off if folks want to do more testing on
>>feature/rename
>> >> >>>>>before
>> >> >>>>> the merge to develop.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Regarding Flash dependencies, I would like to see some
folks
>>use a
>> >> >>>>>clean
>> >> >>>>> machine or try to simulate a clean machine (by removing
folders
>> >>and
>> >> >>>>> environment variables) and see if they can get the
repos and
>>build
>> >> >>>>> everything, although that reminds me that I need to
update the
>> >> >>>>>various
>> >> >>>>> READMEs first.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Thanks,
>> >> >>>>> -Alex
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> On 12/5/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"
>><piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>> >
>> >> >>>>>wrote:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> >Hi Alex,
>> >> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>>> >I did merge develop into rename for asjs repo locally,
but not
>> >>sure
>> >> >>>>> >whether
>> >> >>>>> >I can push it to the rename - let me know.
>> >> >>>>> >Apart of that you have said that you need volunteers
that
>>check
>> >> >>>>>whether
>> >> >>>>> >there are still places with dependencies to Flash.
- What do
>>you
>> >> >>>>>mean
>> >> >>>>>by
>> >> >>>>> >that actually ? Do you mean making build on branches
? I did
>>it
>> >>by
>> >> >>>>>maven
>> >> >>>>> >but not sure whether it is sufficient.
>> >> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>>> >I did also use your rename branch with Moonshine
and
>>everything
>> >> >>>>>looks
>> >> >>>>>ok.
>> >> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>>> >I have also discovered that in the following locations
for all
>> >> >>>>>modules
>> >> >>>>> >"frameworks\js\projects\BasicJS\target\" we have
swc -
>>probably
>> >>it
>> >> >>>>>should
>> >> >>>>> >be excluded in the distribution package build for
ant.
>> >> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>>> >Thanks, Piotr
>> >> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>>> >2017-12-03 12:53 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki
>> >> >>>>><piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>:
>> >> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>>> >> In that place I think we should have Wiki
page called: "How
>>to
>> >> >>>>>download
>> >> >>>>> >> IDE ready Royale framework" - or something
similar. It
>>should
>> >> >>>>>describe
>> >> >>>>> >>what
>> >> >>>>> >> kind of package do we have and what people
need to do in
>>order
>> >>to
>> >> >>>>>have
>> >> >>>>> >>SWF
>> >> >>>>> >> output.
>> >> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >> I don't think we should have in the title
word "binary
>> >>package" -
>> >> >>>>>It
>> >> >>>>> >> wasn't mean to me anything when I come up
to Apache Flex
>> >>project.
>> >> >>>>>I
>> >> >>>>> >>believe
>> >> >>>>> >> there could be more people like me.
>> >> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >> Thanks, Piotr
>> >> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >> 2017-12-03 8:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui
>> >><aharui@adobe.com.invalid>:
>> >> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>> I'm going to try to reply to everyone
else in this one
>>post...
>> >> >>>>> >>>
>> >> >>>>> >>> Today, for folks just wanting to write
an app with Royale,
>>the
>> >> >>>>>nightly
>> >> >>>>> >>>for
>> >> >>>>> >>> "JSOnly" has everything you need to create
JS output, but
>>not
>> >>SWF
>> >> >>>>> >>>output.
>> >> >>>>> >>> The nightly for the "FlexJS" package does
not (and can
>>never)
>> >> >>>>>bundle
>> >> >>>>> >>>the
>> >> >>>>> >>> Adobe playerglobal and airglobal needed
to generate SWF
>> >>output.
>> >> >>>>>The
>> >> >>>>> >>> "FlexJS" nightly contains an Ant script
to copy in the
>>Adobe
>> >>bits
>> >> >>>>>after
>> >> >>>>> >>> you download them.
>> >> >>>>> >>>
>> >> >>>>> >>> And now, I am proposing to change this
packaging so that
>>the
>> >> >>>>>source
>> >> >>>>>zip
>> >> >>>>> >>> will contain 3 folders representing the
3 repos
>> >>(royals-compiler,
>> >> >>>>> >>> royals-typedefs, royale-asjs) and without
more fiddling,
>>the
>> >> >>>>>JSOnly
>> >> >>>>> >>>binary
>> >> >>>>> >>> artifact will contain what is currently
in the "JSOnly"
>> >>nightly
>> >> >>>>>but
>> >> >>>>>in
>> >> >>>>> >>>a
>> >> >>>>> >>> royale-asjs folder and be otherwise ready
to go for Flash
>> >>Builder
>> >> >>>>>and
>> >> >>>>> >>> other IDEs, and the "FlexJS" binary artifact
will again
>> >>require
>> >> >>>>> >>>running an
>> >> >>>>> >>> Ant script to position the Adobe bits.
>> >> >>>>> >>>
>> >> >>>>> >>> For these IDE users, SWF functionality
is essentially
>> >>something
>> >> >>>>>you
>> >> >>>>> >>>choose
>> >> >>>>> >>> early when deciding what package to download.
 I'm not sure
>> >>how,
>> >> >>>>>under
>> >> >>>>> >>> Apache rules, to create a binary artifact
that is an
>>add-in of
>> >> >>>>>the
>> >> >>>>> >>> SWF-only bits.  Binary artifacts are supposed
to be the
>> >>results
>> >> >>>>>of
>> >> >>>>>a
>> >> >>>>> >>> compilation of a source package.  I suppose
we could create
>> >>some
>> >> >>>>>sort
>> >> >>>>> >>>of
>> >> >>>>> >>> script that overlays the SWF-only bits
over a JSOnly
>>binary.
>> >> >>>>> >>>
>> >> >>>>> >>> Meanwhile, to answer Carlos's question,
I think for Maven
>> >>users
>> >> >>>>>you
>> >> >>>>> >>>choose
>> >> >>>>> >>> to get SWF output merely by adding the
Adobe
>> >> >>>>>airglobal/playerglobal
>> >> >>>>> >>> dependencies to your POM.  These dependencies
are in by
>> >>default
>> >> >>>>>for
>> >> >>>>>the
>> >> >>>>> >>> examples.  Although it occurs to me that
MDLExample
>>shouldn't
>> >> >>>>>have
>> >> >>>>> >>>them,
>> >> >>>>> >>> so maybe I'll double-check that when I
have time tomorrow.
>> >> >>>>> >>>
>> >> >>>>> >>> I will have limited time to work on this
until tomorrow
>>night.
>> >> >>>>> >>>
>> >> >>>>> >>> HTH,
>> >> >>>>> >>> -Alex
>> >> >>>>> >>>
>> >> >>>>> >>> On 12/2/17, 1:14 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com
on behalf of
>> OmPrakash
>> >> >>>>> >>>Muppirala"
>> >> >>>>> >>> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> >> >>>>> >>>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >On Dec 2, 2017 11:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"
>> >> >>>>><piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >As an application developer no. You
are getting that
>>package
>> >>[1]
>> >> >>>>>and
>> >> >>>>> >>>have
>> >> >>>>> >>> >everything what you need to build
app to swf an js.
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >[1]
>> >> >>>>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%
>> <<https:
>> >>>>>>>>//na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25%3c>
>> >> https://n
>> >> >>>>>>a
>> >>
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
>>>>>>>>>>2Fna01.safelinks.protection.outlook&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe
>>>>>>>>>>.com%7C87600121e48d4c6d31c208d5426dd0c7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
>>>>>>>>>>178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487961783545679&sdata=Tk%2FEAj8wGk2XBL%2Bg
>>>>>>>>>>Pp2XikeloB%2F1JZ4%2Fj%2BOTiHgnWwU%3D&reserved=0.
>> com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>> >>>>>>>>na01.safelinks.protection.outlook&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
>> 40adobe.com
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>%7C6c1b1a5764ed4b58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178d
>>>>>>>>>>e
>> c
>> >>>>>>>>ee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487578222154409&sdata=
>> pza1pv62ZBM4JLaRzsF7A7OJv9HR
>> >>>>>>>>CliGr1jk7xOjGWQ%3D&reserved=0.
>> >> com/?url=http%3A%25%3chtt
>> >> >>>>>>p
>> >> >>>>>>s://na0>
>> >> >>>>>>1.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25>
>> >> >>>>> >>> 2F%2Fapacheflex
>> >> >>>>> >>> >build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-&data=02%7C01%
>> >> 7Caharui%
>> >> >>>>> >>> 40adobe.co
>> >> >>>>> >>> 
>>>m%7Cacd29e28cb594f6788fd08d539c9a8ff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
>> >> >>>>> >>> d2c178decee1%7C
>> >> >>>>> >>> 
>>>0%7C0%7C636478460681913302&sdata=84IVbhNcVYNkti7qeE%2B6VeEJ
>> >> >>>>> >>> 7E8uDM0y9NDychV
>> >> >>>>> >>> >bYvc%3D&reserved=0
>> >> >>>>> >>> >asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >That's good to know.  I should be
able to use this in the
>>npm
>> >> >>>>>package
>> >> >>>>> >>> >right?
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >Thanks,
>> >> >>>>> >>> >Om
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >Thanks, Piotr
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 19:33 OmPrakash
Muppirala
>> >> >>>>><bigosmallm@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >>>>> >>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> On Dec 2, 2017 9:08 AM, "Piotr
Zarzycki"
>> >> >>>>><piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>> >> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Hi Om,
>> >> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Not sure what do you mean? We
have it. You are
>>downloading
>> >>one
>> >> >>>>>zip
>> >> >>>>> >>>file
>> >> >>>>> >>> >and
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> using it in IDE.
>> >> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Are we not downloading falcon,
gcc etc separately?
>> >> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Thanks,
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Om
>> >> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Piotr
>> >> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 17:30 OmPrakash
Muppirala
>> >> >>>>> >>><bigosmallm@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > With this setup, can we
have the binary release
>>package
>> >>all
>> >> >>>>>the
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > dependencies in one zip
file?
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Om
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > On Dec 2, 2017 8:25 AM,
"Harbs"
>><harbs.lists@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>>>wrote:
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > I don’t have much
to add. For me, the simpler, the
>> >>better.
>> >> >>>>>The
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> decisions
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > should be to get the
first release out as quickly as
>> >> >>>>>possible
>> >> >>>>> >>>and
>> >> >>>>> >>> >>make
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > our
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > release process as
easy as it can be so we can
>>release
>> >> >>>>>often.
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > > On Dec 2, 2017,
at 2:00 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >  I would also
see in the develop Harbs
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > > changes with namespaces
before release, after your
>> >> >>>>>merge.
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > I’ll try to finish
that up tomorrow.
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >
>> >> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>>
>> >> >>>>> >>>
>> >> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >> --
>> >> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >> Piotr Zarzycki
>> >> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >> Patreon:
>> >> >>>>> >>*
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
>> >> >>>>>a
>> >> >>>>>t
>> >> >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>> >> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63
>> >> >>>>>>>6
>> >> >>>>>>>4
>> >> >>>>>>>8
>> >> >>>>>>>14
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%
>> >> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D
>> >> >>>>>>>&
>> >> >>>>>>>r
>> >> >>>>>>>e
>> >> >>>>>>>se
>> >> >>>>> >>rved=0
>> >> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >><
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
>> >> >>>>>a
>> >> >>>>>t
>> >> >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>> >> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63
>> >> >>>>>>>6
>> >> >>>>>>>4
>> >> >>>>>>>8
>> >> >>>>>>>14
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%
>> >> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D
>> >> >>>>>>>&
>> >> >>>>>>>r
>> >> >>>>>>>e
>> >> >>>>>>>se
>> >> >>>>> >>rved=0>*
>> >> >>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>>> >--
>> >> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>>> >Piotr Zarzycki
>> >> >>>>> >
>> >> >>>>> >Patreon:
>> >> >>>>> >*
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
>> >> >>>>>a
>> >> >>>>>t
>> >> >>>>>r
>> >> >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>> >> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648
>> >> >>>>>>1
>> >> >>>>>>4
>> >> >>>>>>1
>> >> >>>>>>58
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%
>> >> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res
>> >> >>>>>>e
>> >> >>>>>>r
>> >> >>>>>>v
>> >> >>>>>>ed
>> >> >>>>> >=0
>> >> >>>>> ><
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
>> >> >>>>>a
>> >> >>>>>t
>> >> >>>>>r
>> >> >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>> >> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648
>> >> >>>>>>1
>> >> >>>>>>4
>> >> >>>>>>1
>> >> >>>>>>58
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%
>> >> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res
>> >> >>>>>>e
>> >> >>>>>>r
>> >> >>>>>>v
>> >> >>>>>>ed
>> >> >>>>> >=0>*
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >
>> >Piotr Zarzycki
>> >
>> >Patreon:
>> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C6c1b1a5764ed4b
>> >58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364875782
>> >22154409&sdata=7TxhOQp2UCwhWbmuizcp%2FNN2%2FwJIkDXVmebfkqB2IF4%3D&
>> reserved
>> >=0
>> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C6c1b1a5764ed4b
>> >58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364875782
>> >22154409&sdata=7TxhOQp2UCwhWbmuizcp%2FNN2%2FwJIkDXVmebfkqB2IF4%3D&
>> reserved
>> >=0>*
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon: 
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C87600121e48d4c
>6d31c208d5426dd0c7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364879617
>83545679&sdata=5BApidwbkvS0448OKfdbVZf4JZdq90lMocn7xI5aNdg%3D&reserved=0
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C87600121e48d4c
>6d31c208d5426dd0c7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364879617
>83545679&sdata=5BApidwbkvS0448OKfdbVZf4JZdq90lMocn7xI5aNdg%3D&reserved=0>*

Mime
View raw message