royale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: NPM for Royale (was Re: Repos and Releases)
Date Tue, 12 Dec 2017 19:17:51 GMT
I think it would be good if we do: apache-royale-x.x.x and
apache-royale-with-swf-x.x.x.
That makes it much clearer.

Thanks,
Om

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:

> OK, I think I got the packaging fixed.  The CI server is building it and
> should finish in 90 minutes or so.
>
> You can try it out locally if you want by syncing up and running "ant
> release" and pointing NPM at the tar.gz file in the out folder.  I think
> you need to "npm uninstall flexjs" first.  I only tried the -jsonly-
> package and it installed for me.  I didn't do any further testing to see
> if the command-line scripts worked or not.  If you run against the other
> -bin.tar.gz it should try to run the code that downloads Adobe stuff,
> which might need tuning.
>
> I'm thinking we should create s.apache.org URLs for the nightly builds so
> you could do something like:
>
>   npm install http://s.apache.org/Royale090NightlyBuild
>
> But before we do that, we should decide on the package names.  Right now
> it is:
>
>   apache-royale-0.9.0-bin  This contains SWF support.
>   apache-royale-jsonly-0.9.0.bin
>
> A while back I suggested:
>
>   apache-royale-flexjs-0.9.0-bin  This contains SWF support.
>   apache-royale-0.9.0.bin  The default package is JS only.
>
> Another option is:
>
>   apache-royale-swf-0.9.0-bin This contains SWF support.
>   apache-royale-0.9.0.bin  The default package is JS only.
>
> I still think it might be valuable to have 'flexjs' in the package name
> for the package with SWF support.
>
>
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
>
>
> On 12/12/17, 10:18 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> >The package on the CI server aren't working with NPM.  I think I messed up
> >the Ant script.  Looking into it now.
> >
> >-Alex
> >
> >On 12/12/17, 10:10 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> >Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On Dec 12, 2017 8:41 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On 12/12/17, 3:51 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> >>Muppirala"
> >><omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Dec 12, 2017 12:25 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>I just pushed changes to see if it can work.  We'll see after the CI
> >>>server builds it.  In theory, you will be able to run:
> >>>
> >>>    npm install
> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fapachefl
> >>>e
> >>>x
> >>>build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%
> 2FlastSuccessfulBuil&data=
> >>>0
> >>>2
> >>>%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5d4cb0a761544b1e6dce08d54156
> c7cb%7Cfa7b1b5a
> >>>7
> >>>b
> >>>34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486763331683835&
> sdata=99F1YaFJunpkbE
> >>>E
> >>>Z
> >>>WSuZdiO2LJAEHAud55Tq5tx%2FYnM%3D&reserved=0
> >>>d/artifact/out/apache-royale-jsonly-0.9.0-bin.tar.gz
> >>>
> >>>And it should install the JSOnlu package.  Alternatively, you run:
> >>>
> >>>    npm install
> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fapachefl
> >>>e
> >>>x
> >>>build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%
> 2FlastSuccessfulBuil&data=
> >>>0
> >>>2
> >>>%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5d4cb0a761544b1e6dce08d54156
> c7cb%7Cfa7b1b5a
> >>>7
> >>>b
> >>>34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486763331683835&
> sdata=99F1YaFJunpkbE
> >>>E
> >>>Z
> >>>WSuZdiO2LJAEHAud55Tq5tx%2FYnM%3D&reserved=0
> >>>d/artifact/out/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin.tar.gz
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Does this tarball contain the Adobe dependencies as well?
> >>
> >>No, it will try to download the Adobe stuff like the earlier npm-flexjs
> >>code did.  However, it only need to try to get the Adobe stuff since
> >>other
> >>things it looks like it used to download are in the package (framework,
> >>falcon, swfobject).
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>-Alex
> >>>
> >>
> >>Sounds good.  I will start working on this today.
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Om
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message