Mailing-List: contact dev-help@royale.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@royale.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D6366642.AEB7D%aharui@adobe.com>
References: <CAJs+wW1nB0Qqfnft0ejmUFH1DK9_MYncq8jz1=Y7GFagKe6ihw@mail.gmail.com>
 <40B59CA3-C6A4-4ACF-A256-BE5C0E9D2E80@gmail.com> <CAP37iKF=Xsc2TWtGUcUEizj+iX0TGGQXL3EbB01EaeAv3gFopg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMFKFRh31u5qK1WRYTV-gCa=EyvKsj9psu_d5siMDL1gYU05zQ@mail.gmail.com> <D6366642.AEB7D%aharui@adobe.com>
From: Erik de Bruin <erik@ixsoftware.nl>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 12:08:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJs+wW3kF3i8OMJ0M_bXqh9d-kYwd6ZaJHCkGFwZ+H4GRBFjbg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: globalplayer.swc
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f54703ad137055e540022"
archived-at: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 11:09:30 -0000

--f403045f54703ad137055e540022
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

>
> The whole point of the feature/rename branch is to remove references to
> Flex and Flash and that includes removing dependency on both
> playerglobal.swc and airglobal.swc.
>
> My goal is that the first Royale release does not require
> playerglobal/airglobal, but you can bring it down as an optional feature.
>

Can you elaborate a bit? I'm curious how that would work, and what
(AS/MXML) features one would lose without playerglobal ;-)

How extensive a re-write are you doing for this? Is it both on the compiler
and compiler-jx?

I'm working on a branch off develop... I would hate being caught in a
massive merge conflict once your changes land. Am I better off tracking
your feature branch? How stable is that?

Thanks,

EdB


-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

--f403045f54703ad137055e540022--