royale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>
Subject Re: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME
Date Fri, 29 Sep 2017 07:32:29 GMT
I'm talking about getting the source on my system such that it will build
and I can work on it.

I am starting a separate thread on the issues I'm finding.

Thanks,

EdB



On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Hi Erik,
>
> Not sure what you mean by "install".  I was only focused on getting the
> repos set up on someone's computer to make changes and push them.  I
> haven't put in much documentation of the IDE-friendly packaging which I
> think we should use that doesn't use the Apache Flex SDK Installer.
> Instead you will be able to unzip a package and use it if you don't need
> SWF support.
>
> I will tackle that tomorrow.
>
> Later,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/29/17, 12:03 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
> >Alex,
> >
> >I'm going in today in a second attempt to do a clean install, and will
> >change/add code and documentation I find missing.
> >
> >EdB
> >
> >
> >
> >On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> OK, I have "ant all" working in royale-asjs and tried to describe how to
> >> set it up in READme.  Please use the packaging branch in royale-asjs.  I
> >> could just merge this into develop since the develop branch probably
> >>won't
> >> work as it currently is, or we can put more polish on the packaging in
> >>the
> >> packaging branch first.
> >>
> >> Please give it a try and let us know what the result is.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 9/28/17, 8:39 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> >>
> >> >"packaging branch"?
> >> >
> >> >I do think some coordination (wiki?) is in order, because apparently we
> >> >both spend a good deal of time on the same thing...
> >> >
> >> >EdB
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In the build.xml files, both are used.  It is a separate work item
to
> >> >> shrink it down to one variable.  And a separate work item to rename
> >> >> everything.
> >> >>
> >> >> Until it is safe to push changes, you can use the packaging branch
in
> >> >> royale-asjs and apply the commits I pushed yesterday and see if you
> >>can
> >> >> get things working.  I don't doubt there are things I missed because
> >>of
> >> >> how my computer is set up.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> -Alex
> >> >>
> >> >> On 9/28/17, 7:14 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayjobs@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >My guess is that neither is obsolete as both of them reside in
> >> >> >royale-compiler. Maybe we just need to rename them to
> >>COMPILER_SWF_HOME
> >> >> >and COMPILER_JS_HOME. But my compiler knowledge isn’t great so
I’d
> >>wait
> >> >> >for more educated answers.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >From: Erik de Bruin<mailto:erikdebruin@apache.org>
> >> >> >Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 4:42 PM
> >> >> >To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> >> >Subject: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Hi,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I'm confused (again) ;-)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >There used to be (way back when I knew about this stuff) two
> >>'parts' to
> >> >> >the
> >> >> >compiler. Now there is only one repo...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >The documentation (READme) has info about two env vars - FALCON_HOME
> >> >>and
> >> >> >FALCONJX_HOME - you can set if you install the 'parts' of the
> >>compiler
> >> >>in
> >> >> >non-standard locations. With only one compiler repo in Royale,
which
> >> >>one
> >> >> >is
> >> >> >obsolete?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Thanks,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >EdB
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Ix Multimedia Software
> >> >
> >> >Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >> >3521 VB Utrecht
> >> >
> >> >T. 06-51952295
> >> >I.
> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>
> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> www.ixsoftware.nl&data
> >>=02%7C01%7C%7Cd32d90407bec4d18102908d5070844fb%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
> >>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636422654452206837&sdata=
> N9n%2BAF%2Be1EPn5QQ%2Bp5TWqdo
> >>HOjoMyhhizRzgPBXBdsI%3D&reserved=0&data=
> >> >02%7C01%7C%7Cc1b663598b5b42669e0a08d506873f12%
> >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178
> >> >decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636422100308217393&sdata=mQQBryNKt%
> >> 2B5D6U2fRwUxz3JZSjle21
> >> >64%2FPmo5QwJ5uQ%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >Ix Multimedia Software
> >
> >Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >3521 VB Utrecht
> >
> >T. 06-51952295
> >I.
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> www.ixsoftware.nl&data=
> >02%7C01%7C%7Cd32d90407bec4d18102908d5070844fb%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178
> >decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636422654452206837&sdata=N9n%2BAF%2Be1EPn5QQ%
> 2Bp5TWqdoHOj
> >oMyhhizRzgPBXBdsI%3D&reserved=0
>
>


-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message