royale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>
Subject Re: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME
Date Fri, 29 Sep 2017 07:03:16 GMT
Alex,

I'm going in today in a second attempt to do a clean install, and will
change/add code and documentation I find missing.

EdB



On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:

> OK, I have "ant all" working in royale-asjs and tried to describe how to
> set it up in READme.  Please use the packaging branch in royale-asjs.  I
> could just merge this into develop since the develop branch probably won't
> work as it currently is, or we can put more polish on the packaging in the
> packaging branch first.
>
> Please give it a try and let us know what the result is.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/28/17, 8:39 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
> >"packaging branch"?
> >
> >I do think some coordination (wiki?) is in order, because apparently we
> >both spend a good deal of time on the same thing...
> >
> >EdB
> >
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> In the build.xml files, both are used.  It is a separate work item to
> >> shrink it down to one variable.  And a separate work item to rename
> >> everything.
> >>
> >> Until it is safe to push changes, you can use the packaging branch in
> >> royale-asjs and apply the commits I pushed yesterday and see if you can
> >> get things working.  I don't doubt there are things I missed because of
> >> how my computer is set up.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 9/28/17, 7:14 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayjobs@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >My guess is that neither is obsolete as both of them reside in
> >> >royale-compiler. Maybe we just need to rename them to COMPILER_SWF_HOME
> >> >and COMPILER_JS_HOME. But my compiler knowledge isn’t great so I’d wait
> >> >for more educated answers.
> >> >
> >> >From: Erik de Bruin<mailto:erikdebruin@apache.org>
> >> >Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 4:42 PM
> >> >To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> >Subject: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME
> >> >
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
> >> >I'm confused (again) ;-)
> >> >
> >> >There used to be (way back when I knew about this stuff) two 'parts' to
> >> >the
> >> >compiler. Now there is only one repo...
> >> >
> >> >The documentation (READme) has info about two env vars - FALCON_HOME
> >>and
> >> >FALCONJX_HOME - you can set if you install the 'parts' of the compiler
> >>in
> >> >non-standard locations. With only one compiler repo in Royale, which
> >>one
> >> >is
> >> >obsolete?
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >
> >> >EdB
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >Ix Multimedia Software
> >
> >Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >3521 VB Utrecht
> >
> >T. 06-51952295
> >I.
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> www.ixsoftware.nl&data=
> >02%7C01%7C%7Cc1b663598b5b42669e0a08d506873f12%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178
> >decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636422100308217393&sdata=mQQBryNKt%
> 2B5D6U2fRwUxz3JZSjle21
> >64%2FPmo5QwJ5uQ%3D&reserved=0
>
>


-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message