Mailing-List: contact user-help@roller.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@roller.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4DD15189.6090404@mueller-bruehl.de>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 18:32:09 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_M=FCller?=
 <michael.mueller@mueller-bruehl.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de;
 rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: user@roller.apache.org
Subject: Re: multilanguage blog / roller 5
References: <4DCEEDA4.3080209@mueller-bruehl.de>
	<BANLkTik=0w0yVELv4xj6+0qNNZxnzM803g@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTinYyqnEz8Y50WE4fh2VoJpJ2DmYpw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinYyqnEz8Y50WE4fh2VoJpJ2DmYpw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------060505010907070906000801"

--------------060505010907070906000801
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I discovered this yesterday. But....

*optionally* make a weblog render in only one language at a time.

This is a good idea. If the user is able to choose the lang. Either by 
his default system or browser language or by providing buttons to select 
a language

we will add a property to the weblog settings page allowing the weblog 
owner to specify if they wish to enable multi-language blogging or not. 
by default this option will be off, which means that a blog homepage and 
archives will show all entries in all languages. when the multi-language 
blogging option is on then the weblog homepage and archives pages will 
show entries from only one language at a time.

What is the benefit of such a solution?

Michael

Am 16.05.2011 15:03, schrieb Dave:
> Yes, would could use better docs around that feature.
>
> The multi-language blog feature was included in Roller 3.0 based on
> requirements from blogs.sun.com, here is the original proposal:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/eo_OAQ.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:18 AM, omid p<vermindimo@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have the same problem too .....
>> any idea ?
>>

--------------060505010907070906000801--