roller-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Ghedini <da...@davidghedini.com>
Subject Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 5.0
Date Fri, 06 May 2011 12:18:29 GMT
It makes sense to include only the Tomcat and Java EE version for now.

I don't see any real reason to wait for JBoss and Websphere if Tomcat and
Java EE versions are sea worthy.

David




On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Dave <snoopdave@gmail.com> wrote:

> Roller users,
>
> We're having a vote and discussion on the Roller dev list about
> releasing Roller 5.0 and we need some more feedback.
>
> During the release process we created 7 release candidates and we got
> lots of good feedback about the Tomcat and Java EE versions release
> files, but we got no feedback about the JBoss and WebSphere versions.
> We are considering including only the Tomcat and Java EE version in
> the official Roller release and considering the JBoss and Websphere
> versions to be experimental. We'd still make the (signed) JBoss and
> Websphere builds available, but not on the official Apache mirrors.
>
> Once we have more feedback on them, we could reconsider and bless them
> as part of an real Apache release.
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> Also, did I miss some feedback about Roller 5 on JBoss 6 and/or Websphere
> 8?
>
> Thanks,
> - Dave
>
> --
> David M. Johnson
> Apache Roller PMC Chair
> http://rollerweblogger.org/roller
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Anil Gangolli <anil@busybuddha.org>
> Date: Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:12 PM
> Subject: Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 5.0
> To: dev@roller.apache.org
>
> Maybe we should ask a version of this question on the "users" list to
> see if there is any interest in these packages.  If readers there say
> they want them, perhaps we could release signed packages for JBoss and
> Websphere,  but somehow indicate that they are "experimental"/"beta"?
>
> --a.
>
>
> On 5/3/2011 6:47 PM, Dave wrote:
> >
> > One other thing to consider is that we never got any feedback or bug
> > reports on the JBoss or Websphere downloads. Perhaps we should only
> > oficially release the Tomcat and Java EE (for Glassfish) files. Those
> > who want JBoss or Websphere build can still get them via SVN or Hudson
> > but they will not be part of the "official release.". Anybody opposed
> > to that approach?
> >
> > - Dave
> >
>



-- 
Kind regards,

David Ghedini

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message