Return-Path: 
 <user-return-5148-apmail-roller-user-archive=roller.apache.org@roller.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-roller-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 13638 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2008 10:40:40 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2008 10:40:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 92107 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2008 10:40:38 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-roller-user-archive@roller.apache.org
Received: (qmail 92083 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2008 10:40:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@roller.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@roller.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@roller.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@roller.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@roller.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@roller.apache.org
Received: (qmail 92070 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2008 10:40:36 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:40:36 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [78.33.47.133] (HELO engine19-1277-1.icritical.com)
 (78.33.47.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 10:39:33 +0000
Received: (qmail 31302 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2008 10:37:07 -0000
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1)
  by engine19-1277-1.icritical.com with SMTP; 5 Oct 2008 10:37:07 -0000
Received: from engine19-1277-1.icritical.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (engine19-1277-1.icritical.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
 port 10024)
 with SMTP id 30746-03 for <user@roller.apache.org>;
 Sun,  5 Oct 2008 11:37:07 +0100 (BST)
Received: (qmail 31296 invoked by uid 599); 5 Oct 2008 10:37:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO exchangegw03.rl.ac.uk) (130.246.135.202)
    by engine19-1277-1.icritical.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP;
 Sun, 05 Oct 2008 11:37:07 +0100
Received: from EXCHANGE25.fed.cclrc.ac.uk ([172.16.133.25]) by
 exchangegw03.rl.ac.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
	 Sun, 5 Oct 2008 11:37:02 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Search works on admin blog but not others 
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 11:24:56 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <4854F2500EA8C4478A508D2D92973E520111C4FB@EXCHANGE25.fed.cclrc.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: 
 <4854F2500EA8C4478A508D2D92973E520111C4C1@EXCHANGE25.fed.cclrc.ac.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Search works on admin blog but not others 
Thread-Index: Acke+a9P7gsZcWxCSZ+rG32/W4SzcQH2t7Gw
References: 
 <4854F2500EA8C4478A508D2D92973E520111C4C1@EXCHANGE25.fed.cclrc.ac.uk>
From: "Pulford, WC (Bill)" <bill.pulford@diamond.ac.uk>
To: <user@roller.apache.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Oct 2008 10:37:02.0596 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[4DBE8C40:01C926D6]
X-Virus-Scanned: by iCritical at engine19-1277-1.icritical.com
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hello All,

I have an odd problem searching the blogs we have set up. There are now
many entries spread over 10 different blogs. If you search from the
administrator main page there is no problem finding the entries
concerned. Searches from the top pages of the individual blogs return
nothing.

Does anyone have any ideas please concerning this behaviour?

The set up is:

Tomcat6016
Roller 4.0
Database Oracle
OS - Fedora core 8

Bill Pulford
Diamond Light Source
<DIV><FONT size=3D"1" color=3D"gray">This e-mail and any attachments may =
contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for t=
he use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addres=
see or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of recei=
pt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or di=
sclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and=
 not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.=20
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attach=
ments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage=
 which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be trans=
mitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England=
 and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science a=
nd Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
</FONT></DIV>=20