Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-roller-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 14901 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2008 21:41:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Sep 2008 21:41:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 2976 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2008 21:41:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-roller-user-archive@roller.apache.org Received: (qmail 2949 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2008 21:41:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@roller.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@roller.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@roller.apache.org Received: (qmail 2934 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2008 21:41:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:41:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of snoopdave@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.19 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.19] (HELO mail-gx0-f19.google.com) (209.85.217.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:40:03 +0000 Received: by gxk12 with SMTP id 12so17413128gxk.21 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:39:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Fl1OeUvr6kpbrJag7GBh+q0yPn2FF4rA0RCsIQ10WmU=; b=qqAXtrWk8pc1fRl3rrN0y2gnDNkc+dp7EbtGv1TXT8H+9wz0PCAc8LZWGXEKwRwaRb tDI/ZhzfrvJOUZhztwBbfE9yDEtzv+KVemzGdAd79VAfrVHSTY1SmS3I6+lTkwklZ0v2 wsJ8OtLTjudcAz4DoJ5CEiVldb7eOBt6RdU20= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=sLYKgNUQVlUEE+qgJdYDSzmWdmolMcm83/Aib43OQhrfSdfGDk+q8o84c+Hh4k9x6v J5YPxOMkvA7xHutFGRW4GMrGEPPVRGGmW871BkRCtU47fV/yItjRBpE/3iwnELzU/+zp yahsE9eyPErmGjvQviiS1aD22Kc6LqWpcntb8= Received: by 10.100.133.2 with SMTP id g2mr4256176and.113.1221169174876; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.196.18 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8fb9ac720809111439o183c824du5dd39fb9e9d0b14@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:39:34 -0400 From: Dave To: user@roller.apache.org Subject: Re: Can I run with non-enhanced JPA classes? In-Reply-To: <64672.51822.qm@web55205.mail.re4.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <64672.51822.qm@web55205.mail.re4.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Angel Vera wrote: > I know the byte code gets enhanced during the copilation, but I am using my own custom builds in this case. I wonder if there is a property that I can setup so that openJPA doesn't look for the enhanced version of the code.? I'd recommend that you ask that on the OpenJPA mailing list. - Dave