Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-roller-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2013 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2008 13:30:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2008 13:30:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 96105 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2008 13:30:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-roller-dev-archive@roller.apache.org Received: (qmail 96085 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2008 13:30:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@roller.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@roller.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@roller.apache.org Received: (qmail 96076 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2008 13:30:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:30:27 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of snoopdave@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.251 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.251] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.251) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:29:38 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d18so120157and.121 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:29:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=3ArFkoN+BJ6Dm0aXNyW3OzUx3OG/pNl7ScFmvlL97Ms=; b=YvMO6O/8pzrKZezdWdaLzURkrg4qT+7tszLQ2WbPK+urgreHRZMWT7RKR0cT/qMEUHSGiWIrSJvCTiCJI+2uirdHBeBo7ZTR5VS55zmYtVQHU0hw8cKAsThlZgD3XNSb2zyKBuAm25a5tcfjBjhFTlbkEjhsDZDs1nk7ZJyomXo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MWdMutgpKB7OmDvFf6W8JACjc0OkabYkuou0Wp1NjE0rT9qhHtemb4u3gmCenpYoUTIHqtBendKKBQv2tA/JkF/nUGhyrcE0zCHscBFKGCs14d6nicKZkcbUY/8NtFDb4e1HcDqsJ9uU+MhFjRPvoWHZmZG+gTrT2C3IeH5zao4= Received: by 10.100.4.1 with SMTP id 1mr3306507and.77.1206624593584; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.109.5 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8fb9ac720803270629w27978e1eobafec3f19e2bd02d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:29:53 -0400 From: Dave To: dev@roller.apache.org Subject: Re: GSoC Project idea "roller-abdera" In-Reply-To: <8fb9ac720803270627x791c80eey6b7d2981bbf82873@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8fdd68100803270608k462555f7i4fa622ae72bc5c93@mail.gmail.com> <8fb9ac720803270627x791c80eey6b7d2981bbf82873@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Dave wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Gayani Kanchana > wrote: > > I like to implement the Roller-Abdera project listed in your idea list. I am > > currently studying at a university and has played with the stuff like Java, > > Jsp, Web Bloging , RSS, Atom and a little Abdera. I am very keen on > > implementing this project. As i have a good experience with Atom I hope to > > use Abdera to successfully expose Atom feeds as an alternative to ROME. Gayani, Oh, and I forgot to say: great! I'm very glad to hear you are interested in this project. It sounds like you have the right experience and interests to do a good job. Thanks, - Dave > Since proposing this project I read that James Snell of the Abdera > project may be able to contribute an existing Abdera-based AtomPub > implementation for Roller in the near future. > > If that is the case, this project would be redundant. However, I > wouldn't want to hold off on development of a nice Abdera-based > AtomPub implementation for Roller in hopes of one that may never > arrive. > > James, can you say anything about the possibility or timing of an > Abdera-Roller contribution? If such a contribution were made, would it > use the new Abdera 0.4 server framework. If not, I wonder: would > integrating/upgrading your implementation be a suitable GSoC project? > > - Dave >