roller-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Allen Gilliland <Allen.T.Gillil...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: notes from upgrade installation test of 1.3 to 2.0
Date Sun, 13 Nov 2005 03:22:27 GMT
+1 from me as well.

i've known about this for quite a while, but since it doesn't harm 
anything i didn't say anything.

-- Allen


Matt Raible wrote:

>On 11/12/05, Anil Gangolli <anil@busybuddha.org> wrote:
>  
>
>>Yes, most certainly.  The only mystery was why I got the warning with my
>>upgrade installation of the distribution, but not when running my own
>>build installed "from scratch".
>>
>>And I just solved the mystery.  It's due to a subtle difference in the
>>log4j.properties that I had neglected.  We turn off the Hibernate
>>warnings by default.  The package name and hence logger/category name
>>changed and I had missed this fact when merging in my local
>>log4j.properties.
>>
>>So in fact we always do generate that warning on Tomcat.
>>
>>We don't seem ever to look up the SessionFactory by JNDI so I suggest
>>that we do remove the name argument to omit the binding step.
>>    
>>
>
>+1.  I've seen a fair amount of discussions on this and the consensus
>seems to be that you'd like never publish the SessionFactory to JNDI
>b/c it's more likely that it will be specific to your application,
>rather than several applications.
>
>Matt
>
>  
>
>>--a.
>>
>>
>>
>>Miguel A Paraz wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>On 11/13/05, Anil Gangolli <anil@busybuddha.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>WARN  2005-11-12 10:01:44,264 | SessionFactoryObjectFactory:addInstance
>>>>| Could not bind factory to JNDI javax.naming.NamingException: Context is
read only
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>I believe this is due to:
>>>http://www.hibernate.org/hib_docs/v3/reference/en/html/session-configuration.html#configuration-optional-jndi
>>>
>>>In hibernate.cfg.xml:
>>><!--
>>>   <session-factory name="java:comp/env/hibernate/SessionFactory">
>>>-->
>>>   <session-factory>
>>>
>>>
>>>I got this when trying to run Roller on Geronimo (still work in progress)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>
>>    
>>

Mime
View raw message