river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michał Kłeczek (XPro Sp. z o. o.)" <michal.klec...@xpro.biz>
Subject Re: OSGi
Date Sat, 04 Feb 2017 06:54:57 GMT
Are you opposing the whole idea of sending data and code (or 
instructions how to download it) bundled together? (the spec)
Or just the way how it is done in Java today. (the impl)

If it is the first - we are in an absolute disagreement.
If the second - I agree wholeheartedly.


Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> FYI in case you didn't know; Jackson ObjectMapper takes a POJO structure
> and creates a (for instance) JSON document, or the other way around. It is
> not meant for "any object to binary and back".
> My point was, Java Serialization (and by extension JERI) has a scope that
> is possibly wrongly defined in the first place. More constraints back then
> might have been a good thing...

  • Unnamed multipart/mixed (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message