Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 539EF17306 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 04:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43241 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2016 04:10:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@river.apache.org Received: (qmail 43122 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2016 04:10:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@river.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@river.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@river.apache.org Received: (qmail 43111 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2016 04:10:33 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 04:10:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1E1A71A0016 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 04:10:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.001 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HC2_T8WGfVlk for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 04:10:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fipsb01.cogeco.net (smtp.cogeco.net [216.221.81.25]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B9E9D24EB7 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 04:10:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=FT/6UnnczXka1/OdLNoC35LxbrvQVy/GTUIhpqvTfGY= c=1 sm=2 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=mV9VRH-2AAAA:8 a=yPCof4ZbAAAA:8 a=6H2uYnFNmPJBwoSK7S4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=haNLWa58BvwA:10 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2DOAQCzqqFW/8lU3dhehAxtiFeyIAENgWIihW0CgXsUAQEBAQEBAYEKhEEBAQEEI2YLEQQBAQECAiYCAiEuCBmIBgMSDq5li0YNg2oBAQEBAQUBAQEBAQEBAQEBFnuHPwiCZYJJgWoWToI1K4EPBYYUCYgBiFmFRoYYg1ZKg3qDBIVThW2BD4Nvg1ECHgEBQoF+GIFuTAGHIgEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A2DOAQCzqqFW/8lU3dhehAxtiFeyIAENgWIihW0CgXsUAQEBAQEBAYEKhEEBAQEEI2YLEQQBAQECAiYCAiEuCBmIBgMSDq5li0YNg2oBAQEBAQUBAQEBAQEBAQEBFnuHPwiCZYJJgWoWToI1K4EPBYYUCYgBiFmFRoYYg1ZKg3qDBIVThW2BD4Nvg1ECHgEBQoF+GIFuTAGHIgEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,328,1449550800"; d="scan'208";a="23716136" Received: from d221-84-201.commercial.cgocable.net (HELO 24b2b4d4-6f72-4c42-a12f-fac553ea6761.localdomain) ([216.221.84.201]) by fipsb01.cogeco.net with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2016 23:10:21 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 24b2b4d4-6f72-4c42-a12f-fac553ea6761.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEA564F2D for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 20:10:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.stratuscom.com Received: from 24b2b4d4-6f72-4c42-a12f-fac553ea6761.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (remote.stratuscom.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ejCggIF2121y for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 20:10:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (d221-84-201.commercial.cgocable.net [216.221.84.201]) by 24b2b4d4-6f72-4c42-a12f-fac553ea6761.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 890FA64D71 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 20:10:14 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: Test Failures on ARM, maybe I'm missing setup? From: Greg Trasuk In-Reply-To: <75CCEC46-C68C-4650-A254-7CA08132B753@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:10:14 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9ECA9E65-5C9E-489E-9761-1AA9681E2C0C@stratuscom.com> References: <75CCEC46-C68C-4650-A254-7CA08132B753@gmail.com> To: dev@river.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) Hi Dan: I couldn=E2=80=99t find your exact patch (might have been suppressed by = the list), but I did the change to qaDefaults.properties manually, and = said it was your patch in the commit message. =E2=80=98svn update=E2=80=99 and give it a try! Cheers, Greg Trasuk > On Jan 21, 2016, at 10:22 PM, Dan Rollo wrote: >=20 > Just a quick ping to see if this patch to remove the =E2=80=9C-server=E2= =80=9D switch could get into trunk? >=20 > Thanks, > Dan >=20 >=20 >=20 > Subject Re: Test Failures on ARM, maybe I'm missing setup? > Date Tue, 05 Jan 2016 22:39:05 GMT > Thanks Dan, consider it removed. >=20 > Sent from my Samsung device. >=20 > Include original message > ---- Original message ---- > From: Dan Rollo > Sent: 06/01/2016 05:34:26 am > To: Cc: dev@river.apache.org > Subject: Re: Test Failures on ARM, maybe I'm missing setup? >=20 > I couldn=E2=80=99t find a way to detect if the =E2=80=9C-server=E2=80=9D= switch would be supported without actually running the jvm, and then = searching the value of a system property (like: = System.getProperty("java.vmname")) for the text: =E2=80=9Cserver=E2=80=9D.= Seems nasty. >=20 >=20 > FWIW, the following docs suggest the =E2=80=9C-server=E2=80=9D mode is = the default now on non-32 bit jvms: >=20 > (http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/tools/unix/java.html - = same doc info for other os flavors) >=20 >=20 > -server=20 > Selects the Java HotSpot Server VM. The 64-bit version of the JDK = supports only the Server VM, so in that case the option is implicit. >=20 >=20 > I guess I'm trying to make the case that just removing the = =E2=80=9C-server=E2=80=9D arg is acceptable. :) >=20 >=20 > Dan=20 >=20 >=20 > =E2=80=A6 >=20 >> On Jan 4, 2016, at 5:20 PM, Dan Rollo wrote: >>=20 >> Thanks Greg, and Peter. I was able to apply the =E2=80=9Cremove = -server=E2=80=9D fix to qaDefaults.properties, and the test ran fine on = a Pi. I=E2=80=99ve attached a patch with these fixes against trunk. If = there is a better way to submit such a patch, please point me in the = right direction ( - dare I ask about git? :) . >>=20 >> Dan >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> >=20