river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org>
Subject Re: River - 3.0.0 Release candidate
Date Sat, 09 Jan 2016 20:26:05 GMT
I am looking forward to a very open strategy discussion once we get 3.0 
done. I hope everyone will focus during that on ideas and logical 
arguments supported by facts, rather than on personalities.

On 1/9/2016 12:16 PM, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
> I sent Greg Trasuk a private note asking him to cease and desist on
> public badgering and instead to just step back and let the community
> vote on what happens with River, as that is the process that is
> supposed to work.  I suggested that if he had a plan and members to
> vote that plan through, that he could have things however he wanted.
> I really do not appreciate his attitude and lack of appreciation for
> the experience and expertise that others have which is different from
> his own.  I don’t want to badger or belittle him in any way.  But, we
> need to use this process and work through issues by using our brains
> and our experiences both.  The “web” as we know it, is “mobile code”
> just like Jini uses.  Javascript won, because it was controlled by
> the browser camp, not by Sun.  Applets were in the browser first, but
> the size of PCs memory and computational resources were no where near
> mature enough for Java to have won.  I know, I tried to deploy lots
> of Java in Applets and applications in that time, to the desktop, but
> there was just not enough money spent on desktop machines in the
> enterprises where my customers were.  I am, hopefully going to get
> back out of the .Net world and back into Java and Jini again, this
> coming year.  I am looking forward to that!
> Gregg
>> On Jan 8, 2016, at 5:56 AM, Peter Firmstone
>> <peter.firmstone@zeus.net.au> wrote:
>> The Apache River 3.0.0 Release candidate is available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~peter_firmstone/
>> Voting on this release will commence in 4 weeks, to allow time for
>> people to check they can reproduce these artifacts and test their
>> code and report back with any issues.
>> The code is currently in trunk, this will be branched after the 4
>> week review period and Voting passes.
>> See also http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html
>> Regards,
>> Peter.

View raw message