Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED55118C83 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 20:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66694 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2015 20:42:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@river.apache.org Received: (qmail 66662 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2015 20:42:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@river.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@river.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@river.apache.org Received: (qmail 66651 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2015 20:42:47 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 20:42:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 149D219E6E0 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 20:42:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.001 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NubwDHNxYowy for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 20:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fipsb03.cogeco.net (smtp.cogeco.net [216.221.81.25]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 66BC82104D for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 20:42:37 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2AeAwA+F8VV/8lU3dhbhFiDJLoDCYd9AoF8FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQjAQEBAwEdBlsLCxgCAiYCAlcZFIgSCAW4FZYRAQoBAQEBHYEiii2EVjoXglIvgRQFlQiVO5EUAiaEGVOCTAEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A2AeAwA+F8VV/8lU3dhbhFiDJLoDCYd9AoF8FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQjAQEBAwEdBlsLCxgCAiYCAlcZFIgSCAW4FZYRAQoBAQEBHYEiii2EVjoXglIvgRQFlQiVO5EUAiaEGVOCTAEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,630,1432612800"; d="scan'208";a="3490030" Received: from d221-84-201.commercial.cgocable.net (HELO 24b2b4d4-6f72-4c42-a12f-fac553ea6761.localdomain) ([216.221.84.201]) by fipsb03.cogeco.net with ESMTP; 07 Aug 2015 16:42:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 24b2b4d4-6f72-4c42-a12f-fac553ea6761.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAD064BF7 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 13:42:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.stratuscom.com Received: from 24b2b4d4-6f72-4c42-a12f-fac553ea6761.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (remote.stratuscom.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vSWIVUdhxxW5 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 13:42:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.115] (d221-84-201.commercial.cgocable.net [216.221.84.201]) by 24b2b4d4-6f72-4c42-a12f-fac553ea6761.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E59864B7B for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 13:42:21 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Subject: Re: Release 3.0 From: Greg Trasuk In-Reply-To: <55C45616.2080301@acm.org> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:42:20 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <40E72272-79E2-40DC-8566-35FB582E3B27@stratuscom.com> References: <55C2997A.9020003@acm.org> <55C38E3E.3070203@acm.org> <55C3AD83.3060609@acm.org> <55C45616.2080301@acm.org> To: dev@river.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) To start with, someone who=E2=80=99s familiar with that branch (I=E2=80=99= m assuming Peter) will need to move the existing trunk to a branch and = then copy over qa_refactor to the trunk. Then I think we need to = discuss what to do with the deep-libs folder. The build, test, and = possibly runtime depends on jars that are in deps-lib. =46rom what I = gather, it=E2=80=99s unacceptable to put jar files into a source = distribution, and somewhat discouraged to put them into svn, so we = should figure out whether we could use Ivy to get the dependencies at = runtime, or setup and document a separate download process for them. Cheers, Greg Trasuk > On Aug 7, 2015, at 2:54 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >=20 > Is there anything that needs to be done before calling for a PMC vote = on the release? >=20 > On 8/6/2015 11:56 AM, Bryan Thompson wrote: >> Just release to encourage people to use it. +1 on release.for me. >> On Aug 6, 2015 2:55 PM, "Patricia Shanahan" wrote: >>=20 >>> Would it be useful to tag it as a 3.0 beta release initially, or = just go >>> to 3.0 and add point releases as needed? >>>=20 >>> I will vote in favor of releasing it either way. >>>=20 >>> On 8/6/2015 9:55 AM, Bryan Thompson wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Or just release it. If problems emerge, people can report them and = they >>>> can get fixed. There is a known reliable release now. Let the = community >>>> vote by migrating their code. >>>>=20 >>>> Bryan >>>>=20 >>>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Patricia Shanahan = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> As far as I can tell, the main remaining release blocker it getting = more >>>>> people to test in more environments. Perhaps we should put out an = appeal >>>>> on >>>>> user@river.apache.org? >>>>>=20 >>>>> On 8/6/2015 9:33 AM, Bryan Thompson wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Maybe it would be good to say a few words about the release goals = for >>>>>> 3.0? >>>>>> I.e., 3.0 provides a deep refactoring that address performance, >>>>>> concurrency >>>>>> and scaling issues. Significant progress has been made towards = the 3.0 >>>>>> release target. X new tests have been developed for this = release. The >>>>>> remaining blockers for a release are .... >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>=20