Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BF1817D30 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:05:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11194 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2015 16:05:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@river.apache.org Received: (qmail 11168 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2015 16:05:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@river.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@river.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@river.apache.org Received: (qmail 11156 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2015 16:05:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:05:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: message received from 54.76.25.247 which is an MX secondary for dev@river.apache.org) Received: from [54.76.25.247] (HELO mx1-eu-west.apache.org) (54.76.25.247) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:04:59 +0000 Received: from relay-hub203.domainlocalhost.com (relay-hub203.domainlocalhost.com [74.115.204.53]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id CE8E92AB49 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.43.7] (192.168.64.7) by smtp.domainlocalhost.com (192.168.69.3) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:02:48 -0400 Message-ID: <554251C2.4070905@travellinck.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:01:06 +0200 From: Dawid Loubser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: River and Java 8 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org That's great to know. Have not run into any issues yet, I was just under the impression that there were issues. I'm going to give it a go next week, and see if our environment is happy on 8. One possible issue - I wonder what existing data stored in a persistent JavaSpace (with collections, etc - complex objects) would do during the 7 -> 8 migration. The serialized form of many basic Java objects would surely have changed?= I'll report back to the list if I find anything interesting :-) kind regards, Dawid On 30/04/2015 17:42, Dennis Reedy wrote: > Started a different thread to not conflate the other. > > We are using Java 8 at AFRL, with River 2.2.2, Rio and SORCER (https://= github.com/mwsobol/SORCER) and don=E2=80=99t see any issues. What are you= running into? > > Dennis