river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dawid Loubser <da...@travellinck.com>
Subject Re: SerialReflectionFactory - got a better name?
Date Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:55:26 GMT
M*e*memto, I presume ;-)

Otherwise, no objections from me - very fitting considering the role of
the class.


On 26/06/2014 12:53, Peter wrote:
> Any objections to calling it Momento?
>
> ----- Original message -----
>> You're sharp, so it is, that's a good one.
>>
>> ----- Original message -----
>>> It really is a Memento. Isn't it?
>>>
>>> Michal
>>> 23 cze 2014 13:24 "Peter Firmstone" <jini@zeus.net.au> napisaƂ(a):
>>>
>>>> Distributed object use SerialReflectionFactory to recreate themselves
>>>> remotely using one of their public constructors, a static factory
>>>> method or builder object, however one thing about
>>>> SerialReflectionFactory bothers me.
>>>>
>>>> SerialReflectionFactory is named after it's implementation, that is,
>>>> it uses reflection.    At some point in time, we might decide we want
>>>> to use something other than reflection, in that case, the name would
>>>> be inappropriate.
>>>>
>>>> How does DistributedObjectFactory sound?
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone got a better name?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Peter.
>>>>
>



Mime
View raw message