Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80FDB10ADB for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38764 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2014 12:43:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@river.apache.org Received: (qmail 38651 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2014 12:42:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@river.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@river.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@river.apache.org Received: (qmail 38633 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2014 12:42:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:42:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [62.129.224.112] (HELO v016368.home.net.pl) (62.129.224.112) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:42:50 +0000 Received: from 89-72-128-67.dynamic.chello.pl [89.72.128.67] (HELO [192.168.0.5]) by smtmobile.home.pl [62.129.224.112] with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer v0.80) id 77ee1801d9e97963; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:42:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1397133747.6509.33.camel@mercury.hashnot.com> Subject: Re: Health of the Apache River Project From: =?UTF-8?Q?Rafa=C5=82_Krupi=C5=84ski?= To: dev@river.apache.org Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:42:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <53468B4F.6090806@zeus.net.au> References: <9845D503-2BCE-4D5D-B7D7-ACC7F3614DA6@stratuscom.com> <1397121466.6509.17.camel@mercury.hashnot.com> <53468B4F.6090806@zeus.net.au> Organization: Sorcersoft.com s. a. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5-2+b3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dnia 2014-04-10, czw o godzinie 22:15 +1000, Peter Firmstone pisze: > Rafał, > > If you're considering a new git hub project, I'd reccommend using the > qa_refactor branch, it contains a significant number of bug fixes. > ClassLoader and URI string handling perform very well also. I'm only willing to start it if it's to be incorporated by the "community" (I guess that would be Greg ;) and officially released at some point, and I don't see a consensus on whether to replace current development tree with qa_refactor. I was going to test our project with qa_refactor anyway. Is it a drop-in replacement for 2.2.2? Regards Rafał