Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CD7E10517 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50470 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2014 08:01:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@river.apache.org Received: (qmail 50398 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2014 08:01:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@river.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@river.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@river.apache.org Received: (qmail 50390 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2014 08:01:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:01:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of la.tinca@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.177] (HELO mail-ob0-f177.google.com) (209.85.214.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:01:10 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id wp18so10048159obc.22 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0CSAUH1zCtvKTWmECvFsXWF+MSbKJNEAkLg5TynWhf4=; b=ipzk3L1CxzGoemHKYxrAwGcOKxZ+0UFbIXYw+xr2baaBJ7I94wAz4Hbdl8vsMfmf0N rwu04Ux8vB5J1jSmJFLvSVPlv1vU2OVwScboAh8PPBtR+g+KPjBYSXYv5Fjn4+qKRNCy uWOtmLNxVtavqPiVIiSNQJE3ikimr1X0AR8sDgYGkDa4rJp8wUO09vF8OjHGeviNZOiv kg17bPBAfuYRa4pp05uZy2LGX6Um5BSNlPTqM2cAEizDEiE/6C7MEmfHk10iTkDiCedJ ZNhtVmwE3KCz8u1edGotngbuThBd+4r0R+NFNs7BC/AEhONOxxy9aTrdrokSxI68ev/s Wpfg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.166.40 with SMTP id zd8mr35478807obb.25.1392192049370; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.233.168 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52FB1DD1.6080803@zeus.net.au> References: <39A69BFC-70DE-4471-A031-85C0BA225C59@stratuscom.com> <52C69018.6060101@qcg.nl> <2FFCF0E9-39DE-468C-A064-5DDDC19FCA03@stratuscom.com> <7DC70848-B027-43E3-922F-A4CAF27CED04@stratuscom.com> <1392114957.6766.11.camel@Nokia-N900> <52FA3AD2.4050202@qcg.nl> <52FB1DD1.6080803@zeus.net.au> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:00:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Vote] (RIVER-432) Jar files in svn and src distributions From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Zsolt_K=FAti?= To: dev@river.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1ce028fda9404f230f82b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8ff1ce028fda9404f230f82b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Peter Firmstone wrote: > http://www.rio-project.org/tutorial/service/service-intro.html > > Gradle and Ivy (if you prefer ant) are also possibilities for dependency > management and if Ivy was already being used then it would be more likely > to be the build tool of choice. However Gradle is attractive as it uses > Groovy and since Dennis donated a Groovy Configuration, that might make > testing easier. > I would vote on gradle. This offers the most on the long run. Cant promise anything in short term but would be interested in participating if we are to move that direction. Zsolt --e89a8ff1ce028fda9404f230f82b--