Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 999B910BE1 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 10:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6354 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2013 10:09:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@river.apache.org Received: (qmail 6241 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2013 10:09:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@river.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@river.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@river.apache.org Received: (qmail 6213 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2013 10:08:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 10:08:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.57.65.70] (HELO zeus.net.au) (207.57.65.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 10:08:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 26564 invoked by uid 16710); 8 Aug 2013 10:08:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [1.44.47.7]) ([1.44.47.7]) (envelope-sender ) by 207.57.65.70 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Aug 2013 10:08:28 -0000 From: Peter Reply-To: Peter To: dev@river.apache.org Subject: Re: Thinking about an Apache River release. X-Mailer: Modest 3.2 References: <1375939725.2163.96.camel@cameron> In-Reply-To: <1375939725.2163.96.camel@cameron> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-owAUAMB7/IZLWmv0kRuY" Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 20:08:20 +1000 Message-Id: <1375956500.2662.14.camel@Nokia-N900> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=-owAUAMB7/IZLWmv0kRuY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-ID: <1375956499.2662.11.camel@Nokia-N900> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ----- Original message ----- > Hi all: > > Recently, we had two issues reported, > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-423 (JSR-160 JMX Entry > classes), and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-424 > (jsk-policy.jar not published to Maven).  I've now committed the fixes > for both issues, and I'd like to propose a release of the 2.2 branch to > get these fixes out. > > Anyone have an issue with a maintenance release of the 2.2 branch? No objections, probably a good idea. > > After that, I think we need to revisit the trunk (2.3?) branch and talk > about how to go about releasing it.  As I've said before, (speaking just > for me, not as PMC chair) I'm impressed with the amount of work that > Peter has done on concurrency practices, but the manager in me is a > little nervous about the magnitude of the code changes.    > > Opinions? > Thanks for the compliment. It'll probably require a beta pre release and wider testing before going to a final release. I'm bogged down with work and currently don't have much time, qa-refactor is experiencing 3 test failures related to synchronization issues with Reggie on Windows 2008 server with JDK7. I don't have the required hardware or software to debug this properly and have to rely on print statements. There are some Javaspace test failures on ARM, however hudsons arm servers aren't available for testing at present. After my last commit some tests are failing due to a missing Permission. The last issue is easily fixed, the former two are impossibly difficult. Regards, Peter. --=-owAUAMB7/IZLWmv0kRuY--