"But I do think we ought to keep the domain reg."
Shouldn't we talk the grand "River rename"? I mean we've said before
now that we'd treat net.jini as an old compatibility namespace and
define some new ones over time....
Just raising a topic, not prosecuting an agenda.
On 12 March 2013 01:39, Greg Trasuk <trasukg@stratuscom.com> wrote:
>
> I'm confused - wasn't that domain transferred to the Apache Software
> Foundation? And if so, shouldn't the foundation be renewing the domain
> registration?
>
> If not, I suspect that we should maintain it simply because our package
> name starts with "net.jini". Who currently owns it? I'll chip in to
> renew the domain registration, although I'm in agreement that any
> content hosting can stop. If it helps, I can host a placeholder page on
> my server. But I do think we ought to keep the domain reg.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Greg.
>
> On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 17:52, Peter wrote:
>> The jini.net domain name registration has come up for renewal again.
>>
>> I'm wondering if anyone wants to take over as custodian?
>>
>> Does anyone have any time or ideas to do something useful with jini.net?
>>
>> Peter.
>
|