river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tom Hobbs <tvho...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: proposal: removal of velocity related o.a.r.config.builder
Date Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:33:15 GMT
>From memory, the stuff I put into the "extra" source folder uses Velocity
to build a kind of fake in-memory ConfigFile which allowed easy
configuration via plain old Java code.

I'd check it, but you'll probably have to ditch that as well.

Cheers,

Tom


On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Greg Trasuk <trasukg@stratuscom.com> wrote:

>
> On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 06:39, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
> > Any objections to removal of the VelocityConfigurationBuilder?
> >
> > To be honest, i hate it. It was build to merge runtime determination of
> > constants, and the posibility to step up to completly text driven
> > configuration, but i'm much more happy with a specialized
> > ConfigurationFile with overrides for getSpecialEntryType();
> >
>
> I agree, the ConfigurationFile approach already has a clean approach to
> these kinds of overrides.  +1 to remove the Velocity bits.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Greg.
>
> > Gr. Simon
> >
> > P.S. if there is interest i will commit described approach.
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message