river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Firmstone <j...@zeus.net.au>
Subject Re: Open discussion on development process
Date Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:11:14 GMT
The last passing trunk versions:

Jdk6 Ubuntu     1407017
Solaris  x86        1373770
Jdk7 Ubuntu     1379873
Windows           1373770

Revision 1373770 looks the most stable, I think all platforms were 
passing on this,  1407017 only passed on Ubuntu jdk6, nothing else.

If we can confirm 1373770 as stable, maybe we should branch a release 
off that, buying some time to stabilise what we're working on now.

Need to check that jdk7 ubuntu passes on 1373770, otherwise 1379873 
might be the one to branch off, maybe try 1379873 first.



On 29/11/2012 10:24 PM, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
> On 29-11-12 13:07, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>> On 29/11/2012 10:04 PM, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
>>> How about the following, we develop on a branch. Then we merge or
>>> patch. We release. We pull a new branch of trunk. We merge/patch stuff
>>> that did not make it in the release from the previous dev branch into
>>> the current dev branch. (we can skip rebranching if we want to keep
>>> the old dev branch).
>>> It looks like a lot more work, but i suspect river-core will only get
>>> small changes, and the rest will end up in other subprojects.
>> Ok, sounds like a plan.
> Shall i do a 'switch-and-stitch' with trunk and new dev-branch? Do you 
> have a revision number from just before the bugfix experiments in 
> RegistrarImpl? We could make that the new trunk. And the current trunk 
> the dev-branch. I can do it in such a way, the revision history is 
> kept clean.

View raw message