river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Creswell <dan.cresw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Service Definition
Date Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:59:34 GMT
On 25 September 2012 08:46, Simon IJskes - QCG <simon@qcg.nl> wrote:

> On 25-09-12 09:15, Dan Creswell wrote:
>
>  If we really see value in the above, can we consider providing something
>> else that works for an ops team too? (Cos none I've ever come across would
>> touch the above with a barge-pole). Or can we at least make it clear what
>> mechanisms should be in place for "best practice" (jeez, I hate that
>> term).
>>
>
> Glad you introduced ops teams. Would a middle ground be possible? Two
> options: A annotation refering to a part in a deployment configuration
> file, or using the annotations as defaults, and provide ops team with a
> overriding option?
>
>
I was edging towards the latter whilst scribbling the above...


> Gr. Simon
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message