Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16E22963D for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8397 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2012 10:46:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-river-dev-archive@river.apache.org Received: (qmail 8358 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2012 10:46:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@river.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@river.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@river.apache.org Received: (qmail 8348 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2012 10:46:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:46:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.163.196.105] (HELO nyx.xs4all.nl) (83.163.196.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:46:45 +0000 Received: from saturn.qcg.lan ([192.168.99.10]) by nyx.xs4all.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0WBs-0007YU-OO for dev@river.apache.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:46:24 +0100 Message-ID: <4F461900.9070606@qcg.nl> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:46:24 +0100 From: Simon IJskes - QCG Organization: Quality Consultancy Group b.v. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@river.apache.org Subject: Re: Release: Making Delgates and reference Collections separate libraries References: <4F457CFC.5060701@zeus.net.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 23-02-12 10:21, Tom Hobbs wrote: > Does anyone know the criteria for defining sub projects? We seem to have a > couple of them now, including the Scala and easy config stuff I'm working > on. One of those must be, does it save us time and effort to create a subproject. I see no reason to build and test everything in one go right now. Or are you planning ahead? :) Gr. Simon -- QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397