river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon IJskes - QCG <si...@qcg.nl>
Subject Re: SVN Merge
Date Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:18:09 GMT
On 11-01-12 09:26, Dan Creswell wrote:
> "once we publish them we're stuck with them"
>
> Why? Presumably we're stuck with them in the same way that Intel are
> stuck with continuing to support a huge legacy?
>
> Of course I don't subscribe to such an attitude - if they're broken,
> we fix them. Even internet API's behave this way in spite of all the
> good REST'ian things said about preserving URL's etc because nothing
> else is practical. We routinely see fork'ing of internet API's or
> versioning where an old API remains but in a run-down, no longer
> supported state whilst development goes on elsewhere. That's the
> equivalent of leaving an API in an old version of the River kit and
> replacing it in a newer version.
>
> Nothing is perfect at release, there's nothing wrong with trying to be
> as right as possible but there are limits and we need to recognise
> that rather than obsess over achieving the impossible.
>
> Dan.

+10!


-- 
QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397

Mime
View raw message