river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Firmstone <j...@zeus.net.au>
Subject Re: PMC Branding Responsibilities
Date Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:24:05 GMT
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> I've read the document, and am thinking about its implications.
> I am not a trademark enforcer. I have no training as a trademark 
> enforcer, and no interest in learning to be one. I did not understand 
> that joining the PMC meant becoming a trademark enforcer.
> Patricia

I must admit I didn't either at the time.   From memory, Sim suggested 
earlier that we should treat committer and PMC member status separately, 
I think he was right.

Perhaps in future when we offer someone committer status, we should 
point them to the relevant PMC document and ask them if they'd like to 
be a PMC member also.

It is my understanding that a committer doesn't have to be a PMC member, 
but a PMC member must be a committer, is that correct?


> On 7/19/2011 1:28 PM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
>> This is primarily an email for the PMC.  Can you all please ensure
>> that you read the PMC Branding Responsibilities page [1].
>> Can you please reply to this page when you've done so.  Making sure
>> we've all read it is needs to form part of our next board report.
>> Cheers,
>> Tom
>> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/responsibility.html

View raw message