river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org>
Subject Re: TaskManager
Date Fri, 01 Jul 2011 20:28:52 GMT
On 7/1/2011 1:14 PM, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
> If the system throughput is not meeting my needs, I'll apply admission
> controls, or "add hardware" to manage the issue. Anything else done by
> river only serves as a "limit" that can be very frustrating to debug and
> deal with.

I would like to make any River controls e.g. on the number of threads
for some purpose configurable. A site that does not want any River
controls would configure the upper limits on threads to be

If we get rid of the runAfter issue, we could possibly reduce the number
of separate thread pools, making configuration simpler. runAfter, as
currently implemented, introduces some O(n*n) behavior, where n is the
number of incomplete tasks.


View raw message