river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter <j...@zeus.net.au>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release River 2.2.0
Date Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:20:42 GMT
You made a valid point about compiling and first impressions.

We should make a point of getting the next release out soon with better build and test instructions.

Cheers,

Peter.

----- Original message -----
> I'm going to have limited e-mail access (iPhone only) for the next few
> hours.
>
> If our incubator space is about to go away, maybe we should shove this
> one out the door, for the sake of the better binaries and having a top
> level release, and then produce 2.2.1 ASAP to clean up the loose ends.
>
> Patricia
>
>
> On 6/30/2011 6:54 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> > The build is clean if the classes are removed. At least one QA test
> > fails. That is why I suggested as an alternative fix removing the two
> > classes and skipping the failing test.
> >
> > Patricia
> >
> >
> > On 6/30/2011 6:32 AM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
> > > Would modifying the build instructions help? And also raising a Jira
> > > to fix
> > > later.
> > >
> > > I'm keen to get this release out, obviously. But like you say, bad first
> > > impressions do leave a lingering bad feel.
> > >
> > > how does the build fail with the removed classes?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > > Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of messaging via
> > > mobile device.
> > >
> > > On 30 Jun 2011 14:12, "Patricia Shanahan"<pats@acm.org> wrote:
> > > > On 6/30/2011 1:42 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
> > > > > On 30-06-11 10:12, Tom Hobbs wrote:
> > > > > > Actually, lets have a proper vote thread.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Release the artifacts 2.2.0 which can be found in
> > > > > > http://river.apache.org/~thobbs/river?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 Peter Firmstone
> > > > > > +1 Tom Hobbs
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of messaging
> > > > > > via
> > > > > > mobile device.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 release early, release often!
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > -0
> > > >
> > > > I don't like releasing with source code that does not compile following
> > > > the build instructions in the release. It creates a bad first impression
> > > > for anyone interested in the source code. I would like to see the build
> > > > instructions updated, NameServiceImpl changed to be 1.5 compatible, and
> > > > have an opportunity to test the new build instructions.
> > > >
> > > > On the other hand, the release does get better code into the hands of
> > > > people who are only interested in the binary.
> > > >
> > > > I realize my negative vote is only symbolic. Three positive votes are
> > > > enough to permit a release to go out.
> > > >
> > > > Patricia
> > >
> >
> >
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message