Mailing-List: contact dev-help@river.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@river.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tvhobbs@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.161.171 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E0C81A0.7080303@acm.org>
References: <BANLkTi=TzmhDrqCzmaOKkyziFfp=uoGoxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E0C3709.9060800@qcg.nl>
	<4E0C763D.6050600@acm.org>
	<BANLkTimY_Kqp7WkhfJZsjGZzDYYGd44Y_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E0C8001.3000203@acm.org>
	<4E0C81A0.7080303@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:20:28 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=ZzGxAdH4K0+SB4iOcAULyRkXm3A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release River 2.2.0
From: Tom Hobbs <tvhobbs@googlemail.com>
To: dev@river.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cdf16a2595eeb04a6ee9add

--000e0cdf16a2595eeb04a6ee9add
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I don't think that infra are going to chop us off at the knees, at least not
imminently.

we need to wait a bit longer (how long?) before we can say the vote was
carried.

I take your point of getting this one out asap though.


Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of messaging via
mobile device.

On 30 Jun 2011 15:01, "Patricia Shanahan" <pats@acm.org> wrote:
> I'm going to have limited e-mail access (iPhone only) for the next few
> hours.
>
> If our incubator space is about to go away, maybe we should shove this
> one out the door, for the sake of the better binaries and having a top
> level release, and then produce 2.2.1 ASAP to clean up the loose ends.
>
> Patricia
>
>
> On 6/30/2011 6:54 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>> The build is clean if the classes are removed. At least one QA test
>> fails. That is why I suggested as an alternative fix removing the two
>> classes and skipping the failing test.
>>
>> Patricia
>>
>>
>> On 6/30/2011 6:32 AM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
>>> Would modifying the build instructions help? And also raising a Jira
>>> to fix
>>> later.
>>>
>>> I'm keen to get this release out, obviously. But like you say, bad first
>>> impressions do leave a lingering bad feel.
>>>
>>> how does the build fail with the removed classes?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of messaging via
>>> mobile device.
>>>
>>> On 30 Jun 2011 14:12, "Patricia Shanahan"<pats@acm.org> wrote:
>>>> On 6/30/2011 1:42 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
>>>>> On 30-06-11 10:12, Tom Hobbs wrote:
>>>>>> Actually, lets have a proper vote thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Release the artifacts 2.2.0 which can be found in
>>>>>> http://river.apache.org/~thobbs/river?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 Peter Firmstone
>>>>>> +1 Tom Hobbs
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of messaging
>>>>>> via
>>>>>> mobile device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 release early, release often!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -0
>>>>
>>>> I don't like releasing with source code that does not compile following
>>>> the build instructions in the release. It creates a bad first
impression
>>>> for anyone interested in the source code. I would like to see the build
>>>> instructions updated, NameServiceImpl changed to be 1.5 compatible, and
>>>> have an opportunity to test the new build instructions.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand, the release does get better code into the hands of
>>>> people who are only interested in the binary.
>>>>
>>>> I realize my negative vote is only symbolic. Three positive votes are
>>>> enough to permit a release to go out.
>>>>
>>>> Patricia
>>>
>>
>>
>

--000e0cdf16a2595eeb04a6ee9add--