river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tom Hobbs <tvho...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Slightly OT : Code hosting for projects
Date Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:27:42 GMT
I've never had a problem with bitbucket.org, which is Mercurial and
has a nice wiki and bug tracker.  I don't know if it ticks all your
boxes though.


On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Dan Creswell <dan.creswell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nope, SF does Git and Mercurial as well. Blitz was on svn, then went hg and
> is now git....
>
> On 11 February 2011 09:29, De Groot, Cees <cdegroot@marktplaats.nl> wrote:
>
>> Sourceforge still is Subversion and CVS, isn't it?
>>
>> I usually use GitHub for my open source stuff. Seems to be fine. Also
>> Gitorious, which has the added benefit of being open source itself so if you
>> like it, you just grab it and install it :)
>>
>> On 11Feb, 2011, at 09:48 , Calum Shaw-Mackay wrote:
>>
>> > All -
>> >
>> > I'm at the beginning of moving all my Jini-related projects away from
>> java.net.
>> >
>> > Does anyone have any opinions on which particular 'brand' of project
>> hosting is a 'good one'? (in whatever terms you define that)
>> >
>> > Immediate considerations are sourceforge, and GitHub (although I've not
>> yet used GitHub), but there may be different services
>> > that others have found to be better.
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance
>> >
>> > Calum
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message