river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Creswell <dan.cresw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Environment Spec? [was; drop JDK 5 compatibility]
Date Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:19:24 GMT
Re: packaging, yeah that split is worthwhile. Suspect there's more but a
good start.

Re: JERI, in the short-term possibly, longer-term, I'm not so sure but if
someone wants to take it on I have no objection. We can try it and see what
happens. Could do that prior to (3) below....

On 14 February 2011 11:53, Sim IJskes - QCG <sim@qcg.nl> wrote:

> On 14-02-11 12:45, Dan Creswell wrote:
>
>> (1) Modular Build
>> (2) Packaging (think this is wider and maybe even separate from build) -
>> in
>> particular stuff like auto-selecting the right IP addresses for multicast
>> etc out of the box.
>> (3) Overall vision, target audience - lots to talk about there. My
>> favourite: How much can we do without mobile code and is that still
>> Jini/River?
>> (4) Promotion
>>
>> JERI vs RMI - think I'd wait on (3) for that. Certain outcomes might make
>> this a moot point.
>>
>
> Shall we sub-split packaging into 'delivery to the user-developer' and
> 'deployment'?
>
> Still think we can use the JERI functionality to attract visible users.
>
>
>
> --
> QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
> Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message