river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From MICHAEL MCGRADY <mmcgr...@topiatechnology.com>
Subject Re: MarshalledServiceItem
Date Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:33:03 GMT
On Feb 1, 2011, at 6:30 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:

> Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
>> On 01-02-11 12:40, Dan Creswell wrote:
>>> Ah, I know Sim is gonna hate this but I feel the need to retain full context
>>> for now....
>> What i would prefer to see is:
>> - a use case defining internet deployment
>> - a proof of concept prototype implementing this use case
>> - define lessons learned
>> If it turns out that there is something in the lookup what needs improvement, then
we can change that.
>> Better not use internet deployment in requirements discussions before whe have defined
what it is. Thats too vague for me.
> I agree.
> If implementing Internet deployment is either impossible regardless of the proposed changes,
or can be done well without them, then making the changes would be a mistake.
> The easiest way to be sure about this is a use-case and proof of concept prototype. The
prototype can be used to demonstrate how proposed River changes contribute to implementing
the use-case.
> Patricia

Michael McGrady
Chief Architect
Topia Technology, Inc.
Cel 1.253.720.3365
Work 1.253.572.9712 extension 2037

View raw message