Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dennis.reedy@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.182 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=QKkUSLmmp0eaUHrchs8VbQGBYUbcmkt69eZPumXW0a86MIZDmLM0tH3tNZnc7vjLWE
         9mRRyLlS5iH3Eyju+3yk+0p88C1lr3+uSiamMHihBi57cPyOBIPANxvWQtksCOpUgYxE
         CKf0GOCafQ1biNBT/H+7O8GOuagimpDMk1adQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Subject: Re: build mechanisms
From: Dennis Reedy <dennis.reedy@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik6PH6x3OWXVDzSvzcS=KY72Tg8P5baNJaYduDf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:02:29 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <91CB45A1-AE48-4C4F-A55D-5CFBBB14F2BF@gmail.com>
References: <4D2EDFE3.8000307@qcg.nl>
 <AANLkTikFvtWhwVRnNqdVX8W6xjv669orfQ0SPMd6pFfi@mail.gmail.com>
 <4D300E33.5080408@qcg.nl> <37E3C4E9-CABA-45B5-8FA4-BE5C088A6053@gmail.com>
 <AANLkTinC=qNFq3_x5ETkaq-NSyE2wYNmvsL1Fg+6krou@mail.gmail.com>
 <4D305D78.2000609@qcg.nl> <4D32E028.3060400@zeus.net.au>
 <4D3408BF.2040201@qcg.nl> <4D34BD07.4020301@zeus.net.au>
 <4D353781.1050500@qcg.nl> <4D3555E2.5070105@zeus.net.au>
 <4D355E20.4090502@qcg.nl>
 <AANLkTimqoWf4Dp3LnBAVLHaXzzC6O0_CKihmgW2EcMw2@mail.gmail.com>
 <4D356CF9.5010401@qcg.nl> <00B7719E-5157-4DA0-9BC4-50940406AE7F@gmail.com>
 <4D3587A4.7010208@qcg.nl> <00131E6D-F143-4326-8D82-C2543EF66A0A@gmail.com>
 <AANLkTimueWJZGRP2fpJ+u-qmqsq_arVa+aCQdNBanUFL@mail.gmail.com>
 <21C1D77F-7D93-4D3D-BC3C-7FCB332B5DFE@gmail.com>
 <AANLkTik6PH6x3OWXVDzSvzcS=KY72Tg8P5baNJaYduDf@mail.gmail.com>
To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org


On Jan 18, 2011, at 958AM, Tom Hobbs wrote:

>> I am not in favor of providing a complete body of work that may or =
may not be accepted. I think providing a POC,
>> that is complete enough to address the core issues should be used as =
a basis to determine whether the approach
>> has merit.
>=20
> Since this is an unusually large piece of work, I'll change my
> original opinion and agree with you.  I think that Sim's request for
> more visible documentation is still valid though.  I believe that
> you've supplied that in the Jira attachment - I can't confirm that
> right now though because I don't have OO installed on this machine.

Just attached a pdf=